User talk:SpiderMMB
Winner/Runner-up
[edit]I added a comment supporting your argument about getting rid of this thing. 2004 talk page. Not sure how I missed your request from 3 weeks ago...Sorry it took so long. Let me know what you think! Hires an editor 15:47, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
- I pasted my comment to the other page you suggested...we'll see how it goes! Hires an editor 14:34, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Reagan's role in the Cold War
[edit]I don't know if you are interested, but I could use any of your comments here. Thanks, Happyme22 (talk) 01:49, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Hi! Yes, the discussion is still going on pretty heavily, so I've had to split it into two disucssions: part I and part II. Most is being discussed at part two, but I'd read one as well to get my proposal and such. Thanks for your interest! --Happyme22 (talk) 22:35, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- Your comments are very helpful. Thank you for helping me out. Best, Happyme22 (talk) 05:51, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Response
[edit]Fair enough, I may have missed some things, and I agree, there's no point to mentioning the experience of the two men vying to be the 44th president. --Golbez (talk) 15:23, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)