User talk:SpeDIt

Welcome!

Hello, SpeDIt, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Ragib 28 June 2005 15:48 (UTC)

Stubs

Hi. I notice you've created several Roman Catholic biography stubs. You might be interested to know that the {{stub}} tag is somewhat deprecated; it would be better if you used {{RC-bio-stub}}, as this will allow interested editors to find your work more easily. A full list of stub types is at WP:STUBS. Thanks. --Malthusian (talk) 17:09, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Marcello Amero D'Aste

A tag has been placed on Marcello Amero D'Aste requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pollytyred (talk) 12:26, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Infoboxes

Thanks for adding the infoboxes. Please note, though, that Republican Party and Democratic Party are disambiguation articles -- they are not articles about the U.S. parties of these names. Those articles are Republican Party (United States) and Democratic Party (United States). Please link to the correct articles. Thanks. Ground Zero | t 01:42, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello SpeDIt! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 5 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Paul Whalen - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Edward Nowak - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
José Lai - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Wangchuk Namgyal - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:05, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Giovanni da Vercelli

The article Giovanni da Vercelli has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article has been tagged since 2008. If a reader can not verify the content, it should be deleted. My efforts to find a source did not produce a reference.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. My76 Strat 03:34, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Todd Akin Wiki

Hi SpeDlt. Saw you had altered Todd Akin's Wiki with "William" as his first name. Just curious as to your source on this. I didn't see any mention of it on your edit. Just want to make sure we keep the Wiki as accurate as possible. Thanks, and have a great Wiki kind of day! Sector001 (talk) 18:19, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Got your reply on my page. Thanks! That page may prove to be a repeat valuable source. Winning! lol Sector001 (talk) 19:19, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to Roman Catholic Diocese of Cloyne has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Wikipedia has a policy called "Wikipedia is not a crystal ball", which discourages such edits. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reference to a reliable source. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 15:11, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mark Takai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Episcopalian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, SpeDIt. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New articles

Hey, thanks for creating several new articles! It would be super if you could add sources to them. I added some for you at Joseph Mechlin, Jr. if you need an example.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:47, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve John B. Pinney

Hi, I'm TonyBallioni. SpeDIt, thanks for creating John B. Pinney!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thanks for this contribution. If you add reliable sources to it, it would be greatly improved.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:30, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Louis Gustave De Russy

Hi, I'm Xcia0069. SpeDIt, thanks for creating Louis Gustave De Russy!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Good start! The page could do with some citations in the text to show where the facts are coming from

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Xcia0069 (talk) 10:50, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Richard Randall (physician)

Hello, SpeDIt. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Richard Randall (physician), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:25, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, SpeDIt. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, SpeDIt. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wangchuk Namgyal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wangchuk Namgyal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wangchuk Namgyal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Bukhari (Talk!) 06:59, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You can improve article— Bukhari (Talk!) 07:04, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]