User talk:Spbvj

February 2023

An article you recently created, Party bus to hell, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, place {{subst:submit}} atop the article, then publish. IMDb is not a reliable source. Silikonz💬 13:24, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bus Party to hell (February 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bus Party to hell and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 14:49, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Spbvj! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 14:49, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hallea Jones moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Hallea Jones, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 23:52, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for editing the page on Silver

Every little bit helps, and you did it on Christmas. Don't be discouraged by bots. 76.77.161.10 (talk) 04:08, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hallea jones (June 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Republic World and wikis/fandoms are not reliable sources so should not be used.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hallea jones and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 17:39, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hello, I'm Geniac. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Akshara Gowda, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Geniac (talk) 17:09, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Swathi jagdish

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Swathi jagdish requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mccapra (talk) 17:25, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Time

FYI, copyedit of your See also, changed from: [[ Newyork Times]], to: [[The New York Times]] because:

Replaced with correct link
Blank/space between [[ and Newyork
Newyork Times would be a redirect from misspelling
New York Times would be a redirect from short name

Best regards WurmWoode^T 18:07, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Manners

Please note that comments with foul tone/menacing/threats, e.g.: "so regret or change that mistake now" are considered incivil on Wikipedia, and may have repercussions rendered by Administrators.

Please don't be so quick to attribute malice. Best regards. WurmWoode^T 18:43, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Breast contouring

Please note that disambiguation pages like Breast contouring are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:

Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory

Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 18:26, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Maran San Awng Mai (16:17, 6 October 2023)

Hello I want to create a legal article. how I start it --Maran San Awng Mai (talk) 16:17, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

First and foremost,please do completely understand the Wikipedia guidelines and required knowledge to create a article or contributing in other ways.Then for legal articles, you should fulfill the Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Legal (Conditions or terms) and you have to provide reliable source for the article.

Ps:Don't do vandalism for get blocked to another username -if you are creating in future (Sorry to hear this username is blocked indefinitely due to your activities on Wikipedia).

Finally,Wikipedia or other wikis are not for Unreliable and Vandalism.

Spbvj (talk) 12:45, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Calbears23 (22:33, 7 November 2023)

I need some guidance on how to create links in the articles, and use footnotes with links effectively. --Calbears23 (talk) 22:33, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As a new user to Wikipedia,go thorough all terms and conditions(Policies and procedures) for editing and contributing yourself to articles...For creating links,use the reliable source for citations,,select the text you want to add link to it,then by clicking the symbol(which resemblance to the chain interlocked)you can add links..For further clarification,Go through [1],2..... Don't vandalise...Spbvj (talk) 15:27, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bus Party to hell

Hello, Spbvj. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bus Party to hell, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:05, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lauren J.Irwin

Hello, Spbvj. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lauren J.Irwin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:05, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Hallea Jones

Hello, Spbvj. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hallea Jones, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:06, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from HFasdjaw (13:59, 15 August 2024)

Hi, I don't know if you're still active. But I just wanna say hi, for now. --HFasdjaw (talk) 13:59, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

dont ask or send unnecessary messages to every mentors..If you have some difficult in area of Wikipedia or related projects only,ask mentors..🤝🤝🤝🏻 Spbvj (talk) 09:58, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from EvanCOMP (18:11, 15 August 2024)

Good afternoon, is "programme" a misspelled word? I don't know if it is, because I've seen the word across the web, and Wikipedia tends to "red" underline the word. --EvanCOMP (talk) 18:11, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Due to British representation of word 'program' some browsers make it as red.(It means nothing to worry as grammatically correct). Spbvj (talk) 09:55, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from SureshMaya2024 (04:39, 11 September 2024)

hello sir..how can i publish an autobiography page in wikipedia --SureshMaya2024 (talk) 04:39, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can't publish your own biography as an article in Wikipedia.(Unless you have significant reliable sources or editorials across web about you.[{I hope you are not public figure or infamous,if so there would been a existing article of you}]...But you can create or write your biography on your user page by clicking your user tab.,

"Writing autobiographies is discouraged because it is difficult to write a neutral, verifiable autobiography, and there are many pitfalls." Spbvj (talk) 13:51, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Theamechleb (07:45, 11 October 2024)

Hello, how do I add information without any infringement? --Theamechleb (talk) 07:45, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Kiduna (08:10, 4 November 2024)

Hello, how do I create an edit? --Kiduna (talk) 08:10, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]