User talk:Spazzature

December 2022

Your recent editing history at Hottentot (racial term) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Edit warring with multiple IPs and now an account? You really are asking for a block aren't you? Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 08:03, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The changes are factual correct. The false information lack reliable references and are of personal view and opinion. This article will be reported as factual incorrect with total lack of evidence. The article will be monitored and false information removed until reliable sources are provided. Hottentot is an Afrikaans word, adopted by English. Provide reliable resources or your changes will be repeatedly reported until reliable sources with facts support the evdience. Spazzature (talk) 08:09, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The sources / references provided do not support the personal opinions provided and lack evidence and facts. You will be blocked until reliable references with factual accurate information can be provided to support the personal false views in this section. Spazzature (talk) 08:12, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So you are saying that you will continue this one against many edit war anyway? Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 08:13, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Spazzature reported by User:Mako001 (Result: ). Thank you. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 08:24, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

False information without reliable resources. You keep deleting and placing false information back. Spazzature (talk) 08:26, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you have an issue with the content of a page, then the most productive way to resolve those issues is to engage in discussion with other users on the article's talk page. You have reached what seems to be a deadlock, so a reasoned argument Talk:Hottentot (racial term) of why you think specific sources are unreliable would definitely help with your assertions. 10mmsocket (talk) 08:28, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The user Mako001 fails to discuss or provide reliable resources for false, incorrect information. Spazzature (talk) 08:31, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There has been a section waiting for you on the talkpage of the article for some time now. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 08:34, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are the one disputing the status quo, both using this account and previous while editing as an unregistered user / IP user. You are the one with the issue, so the burden is with you to prove otherwise. 10mmsocket (talk) 08:34, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Add reliable resources or remove the misleading false personal views. Reliable resources are completely lacking, my edits removed all personal views or opinions without reliable references. I did not add any personal views or opinions. I removed false, misleading, personal views that lack reliable resources. Spazzature (talk) 08:48, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As others disagree with your removal, the *only* solution now is to move the discussion to the article's talk page. 10mmsocket (talk) 08:50, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that advice. The article is absolutely nonsense and misleading full of personal views and total lack of supporting reliable resources or references. The user reported me, so I'll leave the page as the effort and time to fix it to get it to be reliable and factual correct are just too much. Less than 10% of the article is correct, the rest are nonsense, misleading, false and ignore the Afrikaans language where the word originated from completely. It confirms that Wikipedia is NOT a reliable resource as personal views and opinions forms part of articles without reliable, trusted and verified references. Spazzature (talk) 08:58, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It would be much better if you stayed around to help improve things. We need all sorts of knowledge and as long as people stick to process - using discussion pages, using reliable and verifiable references, while maintaining a neutral point of view in the article. Do consider engaging with correcting what you see as inaccurate information. 10mmsocket (talk) 09:47, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because your username is a clear violation of Wikipedia's username policy – it is obviously offensive, profane, violent, threatening, sexually explicit, disruptive, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that you do not intend to contribute positively to Wikipedia. Please see our blocking and username policies for more information.

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, but users are not allowed to edit with accounts that have inappropriate usernames, and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, or would otherwise like to explain why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the following text to the bottom of your user talk page here: {{unblock-un|new username|your reason here ~~~~}} 331dot (talk) 10:36, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]