User talk:Spartan231297

Welcome!

Hi Spartan231297! I noticed your contributions to Barbershop 2: Back in Business and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Grandmaster Huon (talk) 16:30, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hello, I'm Grandmaster Huon. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Flora and Son have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 16:30, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to bother you but I was just trying to correct the page to how I see it fair. I have no intention of causing conflicts with anyone else on Wikipedia. 😇 Spartan231297 (talk) 16:35, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Hello, I'm Οἶδα. I noticed that you recently removed content from The Old Oak without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Οἶδα (talk) 19:12, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sidney Cooke. Roger 8 Roger (talk) 21:40, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your unsourced edits with no edit summary

Please stop making unsourced edits like this [1]. Please read WP:CITE/WP:OR. Cleaning up after you is starting become taxing. Thank you. Mike Allen 16:15, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:29, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sonic the Hedgehog (IDW Publishing), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Canon. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Hello, I'm Soetermans. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sonic the Hedgehog (IDW Publishing), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 07:15, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Hi Spartan231297! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Light of My Life (film) several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Light of My Life (film), please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. — Manticore 23:56, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:15, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Heat (1995 film) and The Book of Clarence. Picard's Facepalm (talk) 14:25, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Trailblazer101. An edit that you recently made to Madame Web (film) seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please use the full name of a publication and not an initialism, such as using "British Board of Film Classification", not "BBFC", as the initialisms are not specific enough and an unnecessary link display. Trailblazer101 (talk) 19:46, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Madame Web (film), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 23:18, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Wicked Little Letters. You removed the plot description and replaced it with a rant from a YouTube video complaining about the casting of black actors. FPTI (talk) 17:47, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for not being aware of that. Spartan231297 (talk) 18:30, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Madame Web (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blind.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:04, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:56, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@NinjaRobotPirate: This user is editing under their IP address (on the same articles that their main account has had edits reverted, for same reasons above) They have also edited with their IP a few months ago. Mike Allen 19:20, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

You will be blocked from editing without further warning if you continue change genres in pages without discussion, consensus or sources, as you did again at Clear and Present Danger (film). --Picard's Facepalm • ^{Made It So} _Engage! • 14:49, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Dead Boy Detectives (TV series), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — YoungForever^(talk) 23:42, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abigail (2024 film), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Stake and Holy cross.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:17, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:55, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Spartan231297 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I obviously knew I made a mistake and requested to have the indefinite blocked lifted. I’ll try and make sure something like this never happens again. Spartan231297 (talk) 06:18, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We're going to need more than your word here; please specifically speak to the reason for the block and tell us what you will do differently- ideally this should also include an example of a specific sourced edit that you would make. 331dot (talk) 08:29, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Spartan231297 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've been told that I violated the rule of adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. All I was trying to do was improve on the pages without inciting an edit war that could’ve had me blocked in the first place. Reason for my block is because I edited the page for Eden Lake by removing content I shouldn’t have.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:51, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.