Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
Administrators:Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Hi Souravjain2424! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like TheAafi (talk).
I noticed that one of the first articles you created or edited appears to be an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is a common mistake made by new Wikipedians—as this is an encyclopedia, we wouldn't expect to have an article about every contributor. We require individuals to meet Wikipedia's definition of a notable person to accept articles about them.
The page you created about yourself may well be deleted from the encyclopedia. If it is deleted and you wish to retrieve its contents, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page. If your contributions to an existing article about yourself are undone and you wish to add to it, please propose the changes on its talk page.
Thanks for message. When you talk about your wikipedia page, I assume you mean a page about you. You have an obvious conflict of interest, please don't write about yourself, and read the guidance below:
When you write about a person, you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that they meet the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.
Your attempts so far have had no in-line references of any kind, let alone independent third-party sources.
There is nothing in what you have written to suggest that you are notable enough to merit an article
You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.
There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ★ AyaenaAya helps you 19:27, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — rsjaffe🗣️20:46, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jalen Folf(talk)20:52, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's crazy that you have to be told this more than once: Stop creating articles, drafts and redirects about yourself. Next time, you will receive a block for disruptive editing. LizRead!Talk!21:01, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You requested an unblock, when in fact you were not blocked. You are now. Why? You keep writing about yourself, and instead of asking for guidance, or reading the rules, you start by hijacking other articles. That is not acceptable. You have time now to read the help pages. After your block expires, if If you have any questions about Wikipedia, please ask at the Tea House. More disrupting of the project, or outright vandalism will lead to an indefinite block, so please consider, and ask before you continue on this path. -- Alexf(talk)21:06, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Sourav Jain, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. BangJan199916:22, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Few days ago I created this account that's time I had no knowledge about Wikipedia, therefore I made mistakes actually I'm just trying to writing a page about myself for as practice but really I don't know it's wrong, somebody blocked my account, but now I learn many more about Wikipedia so I want to give my contribution on Wikipedia even I created once more page it's too deleted because Wikipedia is not allowed twice users account so I am doing humble request unblock me I will never again mistakes Souravjain2424 (talk) 03:34, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Is there anything you want to write about other than yourself? It's doubtful you will be unblocked to write about yourself at this time(please read WP:AUTO as well). Part of the problem was your article hijacking- what is the proper way to create and submit a draft article? (which is actually the hardest thing to attempt on Wikipedia) 331dot (talk) 09:08, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Before I don't know anything more about Wikipedia, self promotion is against Wikipedia, not at that time I have many knowledge about Wikipedia i want to just give my contribution on another article not my self , so please unblock my userpage as soon as possible — Preceding unsigned comment added by Souravjain2424 (talk • contribs) 14:14, 19 Aug 2022 (UTC)
I have moved this message to the bottom of your user talk page so it is with the thread where your block is being discussed. If you want to be unblocked, you will have to demonstrate that you understand some basic protocols and will be a constructive contributor. To do this, you should:
Follow talk page protocols, which include indenting your comments (colons at the start of lines), placing replies below the message being replied to, and placing new threads at the bottom of the page.
Sign comments with four tildes (~~~~)
Demonstrate that you understand policies like WP:Reliable sources by including an edit that you would like to make in your unblock request (or in this thread). Be specific: mention the article, the text you would change, what it would be changed to, ant what reliable sources support the change.
This won't guarantee you get unblocked, but it will help admins to see you as an editor who can be of value to the project, instead of detriment. —C.Fred (talk) 14:37, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
I created multiple accounts because before I have no knowledge about Wikipedia but I read, understand and agree with Wikipedia policy, so please unblock me I want to give my contribution on Wikipedia
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.