User talk:Sosarenaint

This is Sosarenaint's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samson Sanyaolu (May 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by I dream of horses were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Lacks independent sourcing.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Samson Sanyaolu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 00:16, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sosarenaint! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 00:16, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Agunbiade Seun Richards (June 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MarcGarver was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Agunbiade Seun Richards and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MarcGarver (talk) 14:49, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Agunbiade Seun Richards (September 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://seunrichards.com/about/. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Agunbiade Seun Richards may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Rich^T|C|E-Mail 21:30, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Rich,

I hope this message finds you well.

I wanted to address the recent copyright issue that was brought to my attention concerning the Wikipedia article [Agunbiade Seun Richards]. In your previous communication, it was correctly noted that there appeared to be a copyright concern with content taken from an external source.

I'd like to clarify the situation and provide additional information. There is indeed a written permission that was obtained from the copyright holder, granting authorization to use the content from [1] in the Wikipedia article [Article Title]. This permission was granted on [Date].

It's important to note that the content in question was initially prepared for and used on the Wikipedia page for [Wikipedia Article Name] prior to its use on [2].

The written permission, therefore, allows for the content's continued use on Wikipedia in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), as detailed in the permission statement. This release permits the use, adaptation, and sharing of the content, provided proper attribution is given to the original source.

I apologize for any confusion or oversight regarding this matter. If you require further documentation or have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to reach out. I am committed to ensuring that the Wikipedia article complies with all copyright and licensing requirements.

Thank you for your attention to this matter, and I appreciate your assistance in resolving the issue.

Sincerely,

Sosarena Sosarenaint (talk) 09:39, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Where do I start with this...

1. Please read Wikipedia:Donating_copyrighted_materials... there is nothing on that site thar identifys the text being licenced as Creative Commons.

2. You are a paid editor that has not disclosed... you are required to disclose under the Wikimedia terms of use, please read WP:PAID and cease editing until correctly disclosed

The draft has been deleted as a copyvio, Wikipedia is not for promotion, please read WP:YFA - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 11:27, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Rich,

Thank you for your prompt response and for taking the time to review the situation. I appreciate your feedback and would like to address the concerns raised in your message.

Regarding the Copyright License:
- I understand the importance of providing verifiable evidence of the content's licensing. I apologize for any confusion. I will ensure that the written permission I obtained is clearly stated in the page as a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) in accordance with Wikipedia's policies. I will also make the permission statement easily accessible.
Disclosure of Paid Editing:
- I want to clarify that the created page is not paid, and my intent was to contribute content related to a relative. I am a volunteer editor, and my contributions are made in good faith without compensation. I understand the significance of transparency in Wikipedia editing.
Deletion and Promotion Concerns:
- I apologize for any inadvertent promotional tone in the draft. I will review WP:YFA to better understand Wikipedia's guidelines on avoiding promotional content. My primary goal is to contribute in a manner that adheres to Wikipedia's standards and serves the community's interests.

I genuinely value the principles and policies that govern Wikipedia and am committed to resolving these issues appropriately. Please let me know if there are any additional steps or actions you recommend to rectify the situation.

Thank you for your guidance, and I look forward to working collaboratively to ensure that the content aligns with Wikipedia's content policies and copyright guidelines.

Sincerely,

Sosarena Sosarenaint (talk) 12:03, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Samson Sanyaolu

Hello, Sosarenaint. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Samson Sanyaolu".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 03:33, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seun Richards Agunbiade (May 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Jamiebuba were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Seun Richards Agunbiade and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 02:02, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Seun Richards Agunbiade

Hello, Sosarenaint. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Seun Richards Agunbiade, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:07, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]