User talk:Soriv

Welcome!

Hello, Soriv, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Solar salt, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! WuhWuzDat 05:59, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Solar salt

A tag has been placed on Solar salt, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. WuhWuzDat 05:59, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages, as you did to Solar salt. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" is strongly discouraged. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. —Largo Plazo (talk) 07:46, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Solar salt. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. —Largo Plazo (talk) 07:47, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ryujg for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. —Largo Plazo (talk) 08:02, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Solar salt. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Largo Plazo (talk) 08:04, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did with Solar salt, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Largo Plazo (talk) 08:06, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 08:14, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

deletion solar salt

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Soriv (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i am not advertising the solar salt. I just give the information about the solar salt to everyone using the wikipedia. please unblock my page I am a Korean man I am not so good at speaking english I want to put to a solar salt material.

Decline reason:

(1) Unblock requests should be made from your original account that was blocked (2) pledging to continue making promotional articles will not get you unblocked. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:15, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Here's the answer I gave when this person requested an unblock at User talk:Ryujg two days ago:

Note: Your article wasn't a general explanation of solar salt. It was a look specifically at Korean solar salt and spoke of how wonderful it is, and how it's better than any other solar salt. In other words, it was promotional. Further, you ignored the instructions when your article was originally put up for deletion, and kept removing the speedy deletion tag no matter how many times it was restored and you were warned, and then after you were blocked you created two new user accounts to evade the block. The entire time, you didn't respond a single time to any of the messages left for you, and showed a complete disregard for Wikipedia's policies and procedures.

The admin who denied the unblock pointed out, "The sockpuppetry is more problematic; if you have an issue with other editors, you must discuss it with them. You cannot simply create extra accounts to push the issue or create the illusion of consensus." Either this user hasn't read the response, or is shopping for a more sympathetic ear by starting all over again here. —Largo Plazo (talk) 12:24, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To the user: An admin and I both responded to you two days ago at User talk:Ryujg. And now I see that you have placed this same request in two other places. By repeating your request here, you show that you still think it's fine to ignore everything anyone says to you. That attitude is what got you blocked in the first place. —Largo Plazo (talk) 12:34, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]