User talk:Sorbed

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sorbed. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans will be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 19:14, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sorbed (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry, but you got it wrong, I have only one account here and have only ever had 1 account here. You obviously never checked IP address as that will prove I have only ever had 1 IP address on 1 account. I'm just a Microbee enthusiast and when someone comes along and removes stuff due to an opinion rather than fact, get me somewhat upset. I suspect the other person that cam in a undid the same changes on the Microbee wiki is also a Microbee enthusiasts. I thought Wiki admin would have did a little more checking than the words of an "admin" wanabe. I will undo it all again in 1 weeks time and will keep at it until some common sense prevales.

Decline reason:

If your intent is to continue edit warring over links and to make personal attacks, there's no reason to unblock you. Kuru (talk) 22:20, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sorbed (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Wiki should have my IP addy and that should show I am not a sockpuppet. You should also have browser and OS used by same and that I have not violated the "The_three-revert_rule" because the other editor is not my puppet. The real issue is that I made one edit in Good faith which I believe is inline with Wiki's policy, but was overturned.

Decline reason:

If your English is good enough to understand this or this you would know that asking for a Checkuser to "prove your innocence" is rarely done because it is so difficult. In any event, I reviewed the slim record here and I have no doubt that the correct conclusion was reached. Your request sounds like the classic response of someone who couldn't have possibly imagined he would get caught while socking so transparently as to be obvious to even an untrained eye. — Daniel Case (talk) 16:16, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.