Jump to content

User talk:Sopm

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]
Hello Sopm, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

BountyHunter2008 Good luck, and have fun. --BountyHunter2008 (talk) 17:36, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 02:06, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cold War

[edit]

You're the one using flawed logic here — I didn't say that Canadians were in the background in the Cold War solely by virtue of Canada's more limited level of international prominence vis-à-vis the US and the USSR. I said that Canadian PMs weren't leaders in the Cold War because Canadian PMs actually took a neutral, hands-off, "staying out of it as much as possible" role. I'm not loading in assumptions about Canada's level of international influence; I'm merely describing the position that Canada actually chose to take. Brokering a peace deal between the US and the USSR is not "anti-communist" leadership; it's leadership of a type, but there's nothing anti-communist about it. It can just as easily be characterized as pro-communist, because it's not predicated on "capitalism wins, communism loses" at all. Bearcat (talk) 17:17, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]