User talk:Songofachilles

Welcome!

Hi Songofachilles! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Darren-M talk 16:56, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Gary Rhodes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to P&O

Oliver Cheshire (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Attitude

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bournemouth

In view of my appalling error, I won't participate further in the discussion. Thank you for accepting my apology.

But you say that it is not possible for you to add to the infobox. So how has it been done at Bournemouth? Even though I consider it a misuse of parameter which is intended for nesting (village/parish/borough/county/state/country in the US for example), it seems that technically it can be done.

May I point you to the lead of WP:INFOBOX (it should contain the essential 'at a glance' overview – if you only have 30 seconds, this is the minimum you need to know). Obviously you consider that the Historic County qualifies as essential, I do not. That really is the essence of the debate and the challenge you have to meet. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 16:55, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

John Maynard Friedman You're welcome. And no worries; I can see that these matters arouse strong opinions. The historic county has been able to be added to the infobox for Bournemouth because that page's infobox uses the 'settlement' template (to which bespoke parameters can be added) while most UK places appear to use the 'UK place' template which does not allow bespoke parameters. I'm not sure extra parameters can be added to the UK place infobox. But I don't have any intention of attempting to do so unless there is a consensus which seems very far away (alas! in my view, anyway).

Thanks for referring me to the guidance on infoboxes. And sure, we can agree to disagree on whether or not the information is essential! Have a nice weekend Songofachilles (talk) 17:17, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Genealogical websites as a source in BLPs

I noticed that you have been using FreeMBD as a source for biographical information in biographies of living persons. Please note that, per consensus, such websites are not considered reliable sources for such information, especially disputed content. These types of websites have been discussed extensively at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard, for example in the linked discussions at WP:ANCESTRY.COM, Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources#Geni.com and Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources#Findmypast, and here, where FreeBMD is discussed specifically, which you can review if you would like more information as to why these websites are generally considered unreliable for such information. Please also see WP:DOB which explains the policy that birthdates should only be added if they are widely published in reliable sources.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:17, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dixon Ryan Fox, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Columbia College.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Sheehy (administrator), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Irish.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notification

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. JimmyGuano (talk) 13:19, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cumbria

When you remove |shire_county=[[Cumbria]] from infoboxes, please replace it by |lieutenancy_england=[[Cumbria]], otherwise the infobox won't work properly. Thanks! Dr Greg talk 12:39, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing Dr Greg talk , thanks for letting me know! Songofachilles (talk) 13:27, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Songofachilles! Your additions to Gliwice have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:51, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hove

Hi there, I would like to say I totally agree with you on the article on “Hove is a seaside resort “ I feel the same about “Brighton is a seaside resort”. I think this link describes It perfectly and should be known as Brighton, (city of Brighton & Hove and the same for Hove page or even better just have one Brighton and Hove page with all the information on there seeing as Brighton and Hove is one united city https://www.kingseducation.com/kings-life/10-fun-facts-about-brighton#:~:text=An%20important%20first%20fact%20is,two%20to%20be%20separate%20towns 78.86.134.131 (talk) 11:08, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@78.86.134.131

Agreed! Songofachilles (talk) 16:35, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@78.86.134.131 ps. If you could write what you've written above on the Talk page for Hove below what I have written, that would be really useful! Thanks. Songofachilles (talk) 15:03, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

“For the Brighton and Hove pages, I personally think the correct way to describe them would be as follows:

On the Hove page, it should say, ‘Hove is a district within the city of Brighton and Hove.’

And for the Brighton page, it could read, ‘Brighton, or officially known as the city of Brighton and Hove, is a seaside resort on the south coast of England.’

This would provide clarity on both pages.”

This link can be added after official https://www.kingseducation.com/kings-life/10-fun-facts-about-brighton#:~:text=An%20important%20first%20fact%20is,two%20to%20be%20separate%20towns.

For the Brighton and Hove page there is also no short description ie city in england?

Certainly, here’s how that could sound:

“I would also like to point out that if the map on the "Brighton" page is intended to represent just Brighton, it is inaccurate because it doesn’t include Saltdean, Portslade, or Mile Oak. These areas are important parts of the broader Brighton area, so including them would make the map more accurate.” 2A02:C7C:7A29:FB00:3C8B:FF00:4483:D78A (talk) 17:57, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]