User talk:Somesh 1998

This is Somesh 1998's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Onkar Kishan Khullar (April 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kirbanzo was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The article has some prose issues (grammar, punctuation, etc.) and also has some content which appears to be worded promotionally. Please rewrite the article to be as neutral as possible and to conform to standard English conventions. If you need help with this, place the following tag on top of this page: {{Copyedit|{{subst:DATE}}|reason=grammar and style}}.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Somesh 1998/sandbox/Onkar Kishan Khullar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Somesh 1998/sandbox/Onkar Kishan Khullar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kirbanzo ^{(userpage - talk - contribs)} 20:17, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Somesh 1998! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Kirbanzo ^{(userpage - talk - contribs)} 20:14, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Onkar Kishan Khullar (2) (April 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Onkar Kishan Khullar, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

The comment the reviewer left was:

YouTube is not a reliable source.

This draft, as written, does not appear to indicate that one of the biographical notability criteria is satisfied. If one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. It is the responsibility of the submitter to show that a subject satisfies a notability criterion.

You may ask for advice about the biographical notability criteria at the Teahouse.

In particular, see and refer to WP:GNG for notability, which is the guideline that the subject should be evaluated against.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Onkar Kishan Khullar (2) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Onkar Kishan Khullar (2), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 21:33, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Somesh 1998 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Respected Reviewers,

I, the undersigned, express my sincere apologies as me and my teammates have created multiple accounts to upload a similar content under the name of "Onkar Kishan Khullar", "Onkar Khullar", etc. We weren't aware of the multiple-user account policies of your esteemed organisation. (w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/7620ruthik)

However, with all due respect and great disappointment, I would also like to express my dissatisfaction and discontentment towards the respected Wikipedia reviewers as they have repeatedly declined the approval of the content we are trying to upload. And to my astonishment every reviewer is judging the aforementioned article in there respective value systems. For example, the first reviewer declines the submission due to notability issues, on fixing the same and resubmitting, the second reviewer claims of advertising issues and on fixing the article third time, on the basis of the reviewers' respective value systems, the submission gets declined by another reviewer due to issue of reliable sources and we no more see the resubmit button. Due to this we were forced to create several accounts and put our content for review. This kept on repeating for 24 times to be precise. The last time I submitted the article for review with justifying comments, my page got deleted and IP got blocked on the accusation of multiple account creation. I would like to know why until so many submissions, this issue of multiple account creation did not catch any reviewer's eyes.

This approach towards a contributor, form a global platform like Wikipedia is unexpectedly obnoxious. I am regretful to use such a term against the respected and accomplished members of an acclaimed organisation but, truly speaking a single person, on a single ground cannot live up to the expectation of n number of people, who doesn't even know each other. Such inconsistency in reviewing someone's article is not what we expect from Wikipedia.

Anyways, in front of such great reviewers and such great organisation, people like us might stand very small and un-notable (not forgetting that Wikipedia is very strict on Notability issues). But, at the same time we have every right to be judged with utmost impartiality. By saying this, I would like to request you to refer to https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Jay_Shetty , an article in your main space. The content we provided was similar to this, obviously of a person (also an "internet personality, and motivational speaker") of Indian nationality and not British (assuming that this isn't a cause of notability issue/ reliable source in Wikipedia's book of rules).

I am also attaching the source of the page I created (deleted on the accusation of multiple accounts) below. Looking forward for a fair sense of judgement from Wikipedia's side.

Regards, Somesh Kumar Bhattacharyya. (someshbhattacharyya@tech2computer.co.in)

Decline reason:

I suggest you consider the standard offer; given that you continued to abuse multiple accounts after this account was blocked, it's pretty much your only chance. You can take up your process issues when you return. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 21:52, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

SOURCE

Comment: YouTube links provide are of Tedx Channel (Verified by YouTube), and Tedx is verified as notable source I guess as Wikipedia has a page for Tedx https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/TED_(conference). I hope a 29 year old guy with over 300 million viewers, 3 publication and 2 awards is worthy notable and I also hope that Wikipedia can add to someone's notability. My earnest request to respected Wikipedia reviewers to kindly accept this article (satisfying some conditions under Creative professionals).
Regards,
Somesh Kumar Bhattacharyya

Just a point of information. The fact that a source has a Wikipedia article does not in any way indicate that the source is a Wikipedia reliable source. Easiest demonstration is that Wikipedia is not considered a reliable source by Wikipedia. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 21:46, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock discussion

As this is a checkuser block only a check user can unblock. As you admit to a team effort to recreate content that was deleted under WP:G11, to sock puppet and to block evade, I really don't think you understand the reasons for your block and cannot avoid the problems that lead to your block. My sense is that you are among a group of undeclared paid editors. If that is the case, please read and heed WP:COI and WP:PAID. I think it unlikely you will be unblocked to write about Onkar Kishan Khullar. Please tell us what constructive edits you might make if you were unblocked. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 17:10, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good Lord! As you or your colleagues continued to sock after this account was blocked, the best you can possibly hope for is the WP:standard offer six months from now. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 17:14, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]