User talk:Some Creep 06

Speedy deletion nomination of Teresa Celli

Hello Some Creep 06,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Teresa Celli for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Erick Shepherd (talk) 00:32, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Can i create a new article? It's an urgent one I think.It's for a movie called Cutthroats 9 (1972).

Please help me with this, and please don't take it down after I'm done.

Sincerely, Some Creep 06

Some Creep 06 (talk) 01:40, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to write about a topic, please use the Article Wizard to create a Draft page, which will be reviewed by experienced editors after submission. Please make sure that the subject meets all of the criteria in The Golden Rule! If you want more help, stop by the Teahouse, Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 01:59, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Teresa Celli

The article Teresa Celli has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no reliable references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. KGirlTrucker81^{talk what I'm been doing} 02:04, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mutahar Anas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mutahar Anas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mutahar Anas until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 01:21, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Hello, I'm AI RPer. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Mike Pence seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- AI RPer (talk) 13:53, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Idris Elba, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. - ^theWOLFchild 00:59, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Hey, I'm really sorry about that. That really wasn't intentional or on purpose, it was a mistake I made, I was just trying to include extra information on his page. I'm sorry about this, I promise it will never happen again, I kept meaning to fix that but I couldn't. And no, this is not a excuse. I have just started recently becoming a user/moderator on this site, and I almost don't know how to edit certain things, I just don't, I really don't. I'm sorry and I promise it won't ever happen again. It would be grateful if you could give me certain tips on how to edit some certain things, OK. I would be very appreciative. 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Accidents happen to everyone. Don't worry too much about it. The reason why I came to your page, though, is because you added some poorly-sourced content to Straw Dogs (1971 film). You cited a Google search and the IMDb. The problem is that neither are reliable sources. A Google search proves nothing except that perhaps there's a source in there somewhere – and that's a big maybe. The IMDb is user-editable, which means that it's basically like Wikipedia. Anyone can say anything on the IMDb, and it's easy to add a hoax there. What we need are web sites that have a professional editorial staff and are known for fact checking, such as Variety or Screen International, which are both film industry trade magazines. Sources don't have to be in English or available on the internet, but you have to give enough information that someone could locate the source if necessary, such the ISBN and page number for a book. I know all this seems pretty complicated, but you can find a lot of help at the tea house, a friendly forum for new users. Also, if you like editing film articles, there's WikiProject Film, which I've found to be pretty friendly and helpful. Let me know if you need any help, and I'll try to assist. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:59, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In the Mouth of Madness

Please note that, per WP:RS/IMDb, IMDb is not considered a reliable source and should not be used in citations. Thanks! DonIago (talk) 14:57, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Hello, I'm Andrzejbanas. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Andrzejbanas (talk) 00:11, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Andrzejbanas (talk) 00:37, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cutthroats Nine (1972 Horror-Western film)

The article Cutthroats Nine (1972 Horror-Western film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to have no independent indicia of notability, fails NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Montanabw^(talk) 08:01, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Continued issues with sourcing

I came to your user page to explain that reliable sources are required when adding or changing information in articles after reverting your edit here, however it is clear that multiple editors have already explained this to you (some in great detail). I'm not sure why you're not following the advice provided, but including reliable sources when adding personal statistics to articles is not an option, it's policy. Please ensure you are including reliable sources moving forward.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:36, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Some Creep 06. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Dead (2010 film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:40, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Some Creep 06. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Twisted Lands Trilogy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Twisted Lands Trilogy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twisted Lands Trilogy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Dexxtrall (talk) 16:25, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]