User talk:SomeWikiGuy24

SomeWikiGuy24, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi SomeWikiGuy24! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Wiki Facts fixer (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:41, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SomeWikiGuy24 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don’t understand the claim against me ~~~~

Decline reason:

Confirmed WP:SOCKPUPPET of Wiki Facts fixer. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:16, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

SomeWikiGuy24 (talk) 00:53, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How am I a Sockpuppet of this guy, because I edited the same page as he did previously? I saw the dispute of the nationality and added two sources which were created by “Fenerbahçe” and “Euroleague” for this season, this year. Both sources were with agreement and both sources indicated the Turkish nationality. Fenerbahçe is the players club and Euroleague is an officially top level continental tournament.

SomeWikiGuy24 (talk) 10:51, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SomeWikiGuy24 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been wrongly accused of being a Sockpuppet, is it just because I edited the same page as he did previously? I saw the dispute of the nationality and added two sources which were created by “Fenerbahçe” and “Euroleague” for this season, this year, 2019/20 season created for the upcoming season which begins in October 2019. This is how updated my sources are where as the previous sources were from the 2017/18 season (which unbelievably has now been added back to the article). Both sources were with agreement and both sources indicated the Turkish nationality. Fenerbahçe is the players club and Euroleague is an officially top level continental tournament SomeWikiGuy24 (talk) 19:57, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are a confirmed sockpuppet; see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Wiki_Facts_fixer/Archive. Yamla (talk) 20:25, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yamla confirmed how? With what evidence? I didn’t even have time to defend myself... SomeWikiGuy24 (talk) 21:13, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have no information other than what was posted in the sockpuppet investigation. You have time to defend yourself now. That's literally what the unblock template is for. --Yamla (talk) 21:16, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla ok I understand, however when I last used the unblock template I didn’t get a reasoning from anybody and when I wrote without the template I was ignored. I can’t understand how to defend myself if nobody converses with me about it rather than people just passing it off as confirmed SomeWikiGuy24 (talk) 21:58, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SomeWikiGuy24 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Nobody is answering me and I literally had no time to defend myself. How is this fair? What’s the point in this if people won’t speak with me? Only evidence against me is that I edited the same page as someone else...how is that a fair and justified reason to block me? SomeWikiGuy24 (talk) 12:38, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Behavioural and/or technical evidence strongly suggests that this account is a sockpuppet. Simple denial is not considered a sufficient reason to unblock the account. In order to be unblocked, you will need to convince the reviewing administrator that there is a better explanation for this apparent connection than the abuse of multiple accounts. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:08, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I can't review this because I am not a checkuser, but we are here, speaking to you now, waiting for you to defend yourself. That is the purpose of an unblock request. Please add your defense to your existing request. 331dot (talk) 18:04, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I will add that the fact this is a checkuser block means that there is technical evidence of sockpuppetry, it is not just based on editing style. 331dot (talk) 18:05, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]