User talk:Solarpiece
Welcome!
|
My revert on Philippines
[edit]Here, I reverted a recent change you made to Philippines#Religion, saying "Reverted good faith edits by Solarpiece: See WP:BRD, WP:DUE and WP:EW. Please discuss at [...]" (the remainder of the edit summary was lost to truncation). Prior to your edit and my revert, there had been a discussion at Talk:Philippines#Religion section - percentages, sources, source vintages, and I had just made an edit in the context of that discussion which your edit had effectively reverted without discussion. Please discuss this in that talk page discussion section. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 02:24, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Solarpiece, I see that in this edit, you have changed 5–11% to 5.5%, without joining the discussion linked above. Here, I have reverted this change. Please do not edit war. Please read WP:BRD and WP:DUE. Please join the discussion about this on the article talk page. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 04:05, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
June 2014
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Religion in the Philippines may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- 247,500.<ref name="WCE-05">{{cite web| title = Most Baha'i Nations (2005) | work = QuickLists > Compare Nations > Religions > | publisher = The Association of Religion Data Archives | year = 2005| url =http://www.thearda.com/
- or 81 million by the end of 2014) and Muslims' approximately 2.5 million adults who are voters (Islam members is 5% of the Philippine Population. The approximate 1 million adult voters of INC is
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:53, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Edit warring
[edit]Solarpiece, you and I have had editing exchanges in Philippines article and the Lapu-Lapu article. Your edits appear to me to be be very WP:POV driven, and mine have been more driven by WP:DUE. POV editing is OK within limits. What is not OK is edit warring. It seems to me that you do have something positive to contribute here if you can get your POV under control. I have noted your low WP edit count and have held off reporting you as an edit warrior because of that -- figuring that you were still learning WP WP:NPOV culture. I just saw this, however, and I am having doubts about your ability to get your POV under control. If I see further edit warring by you I will probably report it, and a formal report may lead to administrative sanctions (see WP:BLOCK, WP:TBAN). If you have not yet read WP:EW, please do read it. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 13:15, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Need Help?
[edit]Hi. You contacted me in July about helping you out with a Philippine related article. Do you still need help. I'm sorry it took me so long to reply. I've been very busy, and I've had problems of my own to deal with. I hope I'm not too late. If you still need help, leave me a message on my talk page explaining the nature of the problem, and I'll see what I can do. Toolen (talk) 03:09, 29 August 2014 (UTC)