User talk:SojournerJim

Essay-like additions to Christianity and homosexuality[edit]

Hi SojournerJim, welcome to wikipedia

Hello, I'm WilliamNHarvey. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Christianity and homosexuality have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks.

Your recent revisions (one, two) on Christianity and homosexuality include an editorial section at the very top of the lede. Editorial pages exist on wikipedia, marked as Essay-like, but this page isn’t one of them. You may also want to read Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section, and note that it is not meant to be a news-style opinion introduction, but rather a concise and sourced summary of the article content. WilliamNHarvey (talk) 13:49, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Homosexuality and Christianity, you may be blocked from editing. Pbritti (talk) 16:39, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:39, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:39, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:SojournerJim reported by User:Firefangledfeathers (Result: ). Thank you. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:46, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked you from the Christianity and homosexuality article, because your edits were disruptive. PhilKnight (talk) 17:53, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]