User talk:Sofyani123
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Sofyani123, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Jesse Ridgway, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Your first article
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Valenciano (talk) 22:21, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Jesse Ridgway
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Jesse Ridgway requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Valenciano (talk) 22:21, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
August 2016
[edit]Hello, I'm Kosack. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mathias Pogba, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kosack (talk) 10:49, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
December 2016
[edit]Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to 2016–17 Premier League, did not appear constructive and has been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 15:56, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: New Stamford Bridge has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 03:24, 28 February 2017 (UTC)Proposed deletion of New Stamford Bridge
[edit]The article New Stamford Bridge has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- It's not a new stadium, it's just a proposed expansion / redevelopment of the existing one.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 07:05, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of New Stamford Bridge for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New Stamford Bridge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Stamford Bridge until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 07:50, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Removing an article for deletion notice is not permitted. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 09:59, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
The new Tottenham stadium is being built on a different site from the existing stadium. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 10:23, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
February 2017
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to New Stamford Bridge, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 10:09, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at New Stamford Bridge. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 10:23, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
September 2018
[edit]Please do not add or change content, as you did at Flag carrier, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer Talk 13:54, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (Balfin Group) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Balfin Group.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Thank you for your new article on Balfin Group. Note that other editors have questioned the company's notability and whether it is eligible for a Wikipedia article. For pointers, follow the links in the notice at the top of the page. If this issue is not addressed, future editors could call for the article to be deleted.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.