User talk:SoftwareLitigationConsulting

This is SoftwareLitigationConsulting's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Software Composition Analysis (August 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GeneralPoxter was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Software Composition Analysis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Software Composition Analysis, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GeneralPoxter (talk) 19:05, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SoftwareLitigationConsulting! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GeneralPoxter (talk) 19:05, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I will add references to IEEE conference papers, for example.

SoftwareLitigationConsulting (talk) 20:12, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

Please also note that you are permitted to use a username that contains the name of a company or organization if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text

{{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names.

Thank you. Red Phoenix ^talk 20:36, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

SoftwareLitigationConsulting (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

AndrewSchulman (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Changing username to my own name instead of my web site name SoftwareLitigationConsulting (talk) 20:58, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Sorry, we already have an AndrewSchulman. You are welcome to pick a different name; it doesn't have to be your real name. A reminder, though; our policy on conflict of interest is pretty strict. If your goal here is to write about software composition analysis or software litigation, there's no point pursuing an unblock. You'll be expected to write about subject areas for which you have no conflict of interest, if unblocked. Yamla (talk) 21:04, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you anyway. I guess this and similar policies are why Wikipedia is such a surprisingly good source of information, though the policy seems to imply that only people with no work/business connection to a subject can contribute to Wikipedia on that same subject, and that seems unlikely. In any case, I'll abandon this effort, and will just put material on my web site. Oh well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SoftwareLitigationConsulting (talk • contribs)

Yeah. It's a surprising approach to many. I sincerely wish you luck with your company! Software Composition Analysis is legitimately frustrating and I can imagine any solution you have will be valuable! --Yamla (talk) 21:34, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Software Composition Analysis

Hello, SoftwareLitigationConsulting. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Software Composition Analysis, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Software Composition Analysis

Hello, SoftwareLitigationConsulting. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Software Composition Analysis".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:25, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]