User talk:Socialservice

Welcome!

Hello, Socialservice, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! The Rambling Man (talk) 16:59, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Regarading removal content "2G spectrum..." from the article "Subrata Roy"

Since the concerned matter is sub-judice, i.e. pending before court of law, any vexatious or biased comment or accusation causing damage to the image and reputation of an individual in lieu of any court verdict against the said individual, amounts to a criminal offence of Defamation under section 499 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. All persons who draft, publish, or aid and assist in drafting or publishing any such defamatory content are liable to be prosecuted in the court of law. --115.113.103.104 (talk) 08:52, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The IP address posting the above has now been blocked for making legal threats. In addition, it has been pointed out that the "Indian Penal Code" is likely of no relevance to editors who are not located in India, nor to Wikipedia itself (since Wikipedia is not hosted in India). --Demiurge1000 (talk) 14:20, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Robert W. Poole, Jr.

I noticed that you reverted edits to Robert W. Poole, Jr. and issued a template warning to the editor who blanked the page. I was about to do the same when I noticed that the editor who blanked it was also the page creator. In the circumstances, I interpreted this as an implicit request for deletion. While the editor has had some copyright issues perhaps a template warning might be a little harsh in this instance. FrankFlanagan (talk) 21:37, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome, I have done worse and am sure that I will do again.FrankFlanagan (talk) 21:45, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Failed to check everything that I should have checked, sometimes because I did not realise that I should have checked something, or perhaps that it was possible to check and sometimes because I thought the correct response to something was so obvious that there was no need to check. Sometimes, when having reverted blatent vandalismm, it is hard to remember the 'assume good faith' principle and that a new editor can mess up a page commpletly unintentionally. FrankFlanagan (talk) 22:36, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Headmasters nickname

I can find nowhere where the nickname is mentioned (the college isnt going to put something like that on their website) so I have omitted it from the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.11.93.44 (talk) 16:53, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dawn Porter

I have reverted your own recent revert at Dawn Porter and added a note to counteract that which you posted - see User_talk:Dbusher#July_2011. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 20:10, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for making me noticed. Should I revert the warning on the user talk page also ? Socialservice (talk) 20:34, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't think you need to go that far &, in any event, now that I have commented there any refactoring would itself present problems. Maybe just drop a line to apologise for the confusion? These things happen (and don't I know it!). - Sitush (talk) 20:42, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hi, thanks for reverting the vandal on my user page.[1]--Ben Ben (talk) 22:20, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Socialservice (talk) 22:23, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lakehead University

Hi Socialservice, I noticed you had reverted the changes I made to the Lakehead University article citing "sources" as the reason. Given my edits were mostly a re-arrangement of previous content to improve sentence structure and flow, can you please indicate specifics as to which details require additional sources? Nganga2 (talk) 00:21, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding references now. Socialservice (talk) 07:23, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rock City (group)

I alerted the other editor that the one title shouldn't be censored, but I don't think I can properly judge whether the "#" should be an U or an I. :) Calabe1992 (talk) 19:24, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Even I didn't know so i reverted my edit. :) Socialservice (talk) 05:11, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you!

Hello Socialservice! I hope you enjoy this cookie as an amicable greeting from a fellow Wikipedian, SwisterTwister talk 20:02, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Socialservice. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Socialservice. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello Socialservice! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 22:32, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Socialservice. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]