Jump to content

User talk:Socheid

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Socheid, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --John (talk) 22:28, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Some more great edits there. Don't forget to provide an edit summary. It helps other editors to know what you were doing. --John (talk) 18:44, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome pt2

[edit]

I have to ask; are you a Doonhamer yourself? I lived near Dumfries for many years and I love the area. I hope you're enjoying yourself here and I look forward to helping you in any way that I can. Best wishes --John (talk) 03:43, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I lived just outside Lockerbie from age 12 until 17. I later lived in Dumfries (Buccleuch St) for a while. My parents still live in the area, and my sister and family live near Castle Douglas. I have many fond memories of the area. John (talk) 15:33, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Doonhamer

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Doonhamer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Niaz(Talk • Contribs) 16:09, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jimmy McKinnell

[edit]

Further to your creation of the above article. Please note that biographies should be about one person, not two. If they are both notable enough to be on wikipedia then they should both have an article, not a joint one. Might I also strongly urge you to read through these articles - WP:BETTER, WP:HOW, WP:VER. Thank you.♦Tangerines♦·Talk 23:17, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A request

[edit]

Please don't take this the wrong way, however the articles you are creating are making work for other users as you aren't creating them in the correct format. I really would urge you to slow down from creating new articles, have a read of the articles I linked you to above especially about how to create articles. All the little things need to be right, and you aren't formatting the articles correctly. For instance the article name needs to be in bold the first time it is mentioned, as one example. I would be more than happy to help you, but I would urge you to stop creating articles for now, read up about how to create them and then start again. There is no huge rush to get all these articles onto wikipedia, there is plenty of time to do so. I hope you don't take offence at my comments I can assure you I mean well. Thank you and if you have any questions just ask. And slow down!!! :) ♦Tangerines♦·Talk 00:58, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great result

[edit]

Were you there? I envy you if you were. --John (talk) 05:43, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And I just want to say, respect to your nephew for his perfect photographic timing! 89:59... wow. Seems to be a flawless photo too. Awesome. I was there but most of my pics are a bit pants. Great game!Contains Mild Peril (talk) 22:10, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Star

[edit]

Hey, I hope you don't mind but I added an award to your user page. See User:Socheid. Best wishes, --John (talk) 18:46, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images

[edit]

Here are a couple of handy pages.

Read them, and if you have any problems let me know. Incidentally, when you post to a talk page, you should sign by typing ~~~~ after your post. It inserts a datestamp and your name. Keep well, --John (talk) 17:01, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Scoreboard cropped.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:18, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

North African Champions Cup

[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of North African Champions Cup, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.rsssf.com/tablesn/nafrchamp.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:31, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How do I add a link to this page? - Links to uk interwiki

[edit]

I had to look this up just recently. I started with the Help link on the left side. Then searched for the word 'link' which found me "Links and references". I then had to look in that page, and found "Wikipedia:Interlanguage links".

That page seems to say that your "http://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/" in

http://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9C%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%96%D1%81%D1%82_%28%D0%A5%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BA%D1%96%D0%B2%29

could be translated to just "uk:" like so

[[uk:%D0%9C%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%96%D1%81%D1%82_%28%D0%A5%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BA%D1%96%D0%B2%29]]

Let's try that here. Does that work correctly? Shenme (talk) 05:35, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images again

[edit]

Hi again and thanks for your messages. I restored your deleted image Image:Scoreboard cropped.JPG and added an appropriate copyright tag for you. You should inspect it and make sure it is what you wanted. Remember to sign posts you make on user talk and article talk by typing four tildes (~~~~). This will produce your name and a timestamp, and makes it easier to see who has posted. Let me know if you need any other help. Best wishes, --John (talk) 21:25, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Scoreboard cropped.JPG missing description details

[edit]
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Scoreboard cropped.JPG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers. If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. John (talk) 21:37, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Queen of the South and the Bible

[edit]

Thanks for your inquiry. Can you please join the debate at Talk:Queen of the South F.C. and see if we can come up with a solution? Thanks, --John (talk) 21:36, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That was a great post. I'm inclined to agree with the points you make. Could you please, please sign your posts in talk? Either type four tildes (~~~~) or use the button on the edit interface; it's the tenth from the left. --John (talk) 19:26, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This? ≈


That doesn't seem to have worked. How about this? Socheid (talk) 19:32, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bingo Socheid (talk) 19:32, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Baker's window.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:29, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed it for you. All the best and thanks for all your great work. --John (talk) 01:45, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neil Martin

[edit]

I used the site I linked to - http://www.neilbrown.newcastlefans.com/. Regards, пﮟოьεԻ 57 17:23, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page hits

[edit]

You asked me ages ago about this and I said I would get back to you. This would seem to answer your question. I am very sorry to have taken so long to answer the question. Best wishes, --John (talk) 18:09, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Academy.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 10:22, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:02 Burns and greyfriars.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 00:18, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:04 Fountain and midsteeple.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 00:45, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:05 The caul and old brig.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 00:47, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:06 Terregles Road hump back bridge.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 00:48, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:07 Terregles Road.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 00:52, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:24 Queens bus.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 01:08, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:25 Dumfries Odeon.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 01:09, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:26 Doogie Doonhamer.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 01:09, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:38 JT.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 01:12, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:40 John O'Neill.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 01:20, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:41 QoS passport.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 01:21, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:42 Wee Billy Dodds.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 01:22, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:43 Andy Aitken.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 01:23, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:44 Neil MacFarlane.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 01:23, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:45 Stephen Dobbie.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 01:23, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:46 John Stewart.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 01:24, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:47 Chis.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 01:25, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Willie Laird

[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Willie Laird, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://members.tripod.com/~corstorphine/laird.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:51, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hughie Gallacher

[edit]

I see that you have vastly expanded this article, especially the events leading to his death. Unfortunately, most of your additions seem to be a straight copy & paste job from the Independent article you have referenced - as this is copyright, can I suggest that you rewrite it in your own words to avoid having the whole article deleted for copyright violation. Cheers. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 14:47, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of Aston Villa F.C. players

[edit]

Hi there, I have removed Ian Dickson (footballer) from the List of Aston Villa F.C. players article as he does not meet the requirements for the list; 125 games, or a significant club record. He didn't have either I'm afraid, so I have removed it from the list. If you have any queries, don't hesitate to leave a note on my talkpage. Regards. Woody (talk) 19:26, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Willie Laird

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Willie Laird requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 15:35, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nonfree images

[edit]

You can't use images for which the copyright belongs to someone else. A match programme or a match ticket are not acceptable to illustrate an article on a club or a modern player. Older ones might be more acceptable. --John (talk) 15:52, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Message

[edit]
Hello, Socheid. You have new messages at John's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Fair use rationale for Image:QoS_1936.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:QoS_1936.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 21:10, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:QoS fans at the SC final.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 15:06, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reference citation

[edit]

I have made a reference citation that you can use on the articles you have been creating from the book The Queens. Hope it helps.Waterden (talk) 21:43, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

<ref name="queens">{{cite book|last=McCartney|first=Iain|title=The Queens 1919-2004|publisher=Creedon Publications|date=2004|edition=First Edition|isbn=1-8993-1652-3|accessdate=2008-09-12}}</ref>

Key teammates

[edit]

I'm looking for the question I asked about this a while ago. It was shot down. I'll link you to it when I find it. - Dudesleeper / Talk 18:14, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Found it. - Dudesleeper / Talk 18:19, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, bring it up again at the Football project. - Dudesleeper / Talk 18:34, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Go here. Be sure to link to Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football/Archive_15#Teammates in your post. - Dudesleeper / Talk 18:41, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Scotland trip to the World Cup in 1954

[edit]

It doesn't matter what I believe — that's the point. We should just state basic facts, not personal opinions. - Dudesleeper / Talk 18:48, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously the Scottish FA website is going to show a little bias. Please try writing articles as a neutral football fan, not as a Queen of the South or Scotland fan; it makes less work for the rest of us. - Dudesleeper / Talk 18:51, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm just frustrated that we keep going round in circles. Point-of-view is point-of-view even if it's written by a journalist. We should leave people to make up their own minds as to whether the Scotland side was poorly managed, or whether there were other mitigating circumstances. Please look around at other club articles (especially those with good-article status, or those that have been featured on the main page) for guidelines on how to put information across without ramming it down readers' throats. - Dudesleeper / Talk 19:21, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Review of your articles

[edit]

I wondered how long it would take for you to get tired of going down the list. I'm sure you'll have noted that those articles are just ones I started; obviously, they have received input from other editors since then, so feel free to continue your editing crusade. After all, it will permit me more time to tidy the Queen of the South article in an uninterrupted fashion. - Dudesleeper / Talk 12:53, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Tom Daley, it looks like someone disagreed with your edit. - Dudesleeper / Talk 17:24, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your query

[edit]

Hi Socheid and great to hear from you again. I think I am personally neutral on the question of "it" versus "they" on the QoS article. I know it has been agreed that for bands, we adopt the usage you suggest, so your view does at least seem arguable. Have you thought of raising it at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football? That might be the best bet. Let me know if I can be any further help. Take care, --John (talk) 07:39, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page move

[edit]

When you recently moved Thomas Mitchell to Thomas Mitchell (explorer), and then redirected the original title to the disambiguation page, you neglected to notice that were a half-dozen or so other pages that redirected to Thomas Mitchell, as well as numerous links from other articles, that obviously were intended to refer to the explorer. For example, your move left Sir Thomas Livingstone Mitchell as a redirect to the disambiguation page, rather than to the biographical article. In future, if you choose to move an existing page in a way that breaks links, please take the time to check for and correct existing redirects and existing links in connection with the move. Thank you. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 13:20, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Scott McQuade (footballer)

[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Scott McQuade (footballer), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Fails WP:ATHLETE

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. GedUK  19:17, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Did you take this photograph?

[edit]

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/File:01_Academy.JPG Did you take this photograph? If so then you're copyright info is correct as the photographer in most cases retains copyright. --Kolrobie (talk) 06:43, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I did take it.

Craig Wilson

[edit]

If you want to delete redirects, please try WP:RFD rather than blanking them --Rumping (talk) 08:17, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Stephen Halliday

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Stephen Halliday requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Smappy (talk) 08:58, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:02_Greyfriars_plaque.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Closedmouth (talk) 14:25, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nancy Murdoch

[edit]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Nancy Murdoch. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nancy Murdoch

[edit]

The article Nancy Murdoch has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010 must have references.


If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided reliable sources, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide sources within 10 days, you may request the article be undeleted when you have sources. NW (Talk) 00:16, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Don Peattie

[edit]

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Don Peattie requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. [ dotKuro ] [ talk ] [ contribs ] 11:58, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:53, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply] 

Thank you.


Articles for deletion nomination of Marty McLoughlin

[edit]

I have nominated Marty McLoughlin, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marty McLoughlin. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Herostratus (talk) 17:56, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of "Queen of the South (movie)"

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on "Queen of the South (movie)" requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ironholds (talk) 12:35, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Queen of the South (movie)

[edit]
It looks like the movie has been cancelled -- Prove It (talk) 14:47, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Please pardon me, can you help me understand what your point is please? The info in the web link you provided is nothing new. There's a zillion other articles on the internet on this movie been published since the one you listed.

Socheid (talk) 08:59, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Flint

[edit]

Hi, I'm not quite sure what's going on here, but I did make a mistake reverting your edit. If you're gonna blank pages because they aren't required any more then please tag them for speedy deletion too so it doesn't come up as vandalism. Thanks. —Half Price 19:16, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've now done that. —Half Price 19:22, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Expand

[edit]

When you tag an article with the {{Expand}} notice, you need to use the full name of the month - e.g. "December 2010", not "Dec 2010" - otherwise the template's links and categories will be broken. —Paul A (talk) 02:52, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dead people

[edit]

Individual articles do not belong in Category:Dead people. Use the category for their year of death, such as Category:2010 deaths; or if you don't know that, use Category:Year of death missing. —Paul A (talk) 02:54, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jimmy Gallagher (sax)

[edit]

The article Jimmy Gallagher (sax) has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 18:04, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Norrie Haywood

[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Norrie Haywood, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.spain-clubs.org/racing_santander.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:00, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, regarding the Norrie Haywood article, could you tell me which article you first wrote the material that is showing up as a copyvio? We need to be able to properly attribute it by linking to the article it came from. Also, I'm trying to make it clear that stuff has been copied from Wikipedia, so it would be helpful to see where the content developed. Could you also let me know which other articles have the same text? Thanks, --BelovedFreak 20:54, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Socheid. Wikipedia has to be really careful about copyright issues, so just to be on the safe side, I've blanked that section as a potential infringement of the site. It will be listed at WP:CP for further evaluation. Thank you :) Acather96 (talk) 18:51, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, was going to come back to this, but I'll leave it to WP:CP, thanks Acather96. --BelovedFreak 18:58, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ross Hyslop

[edit]

The article Ross Hyslop has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Footballer who does not appear to have played a game at top level professional league. youth / reserve only appearances claimed. fails WP:NSPORTS and coverage is only general sports journalism

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ClubOranjeT 07:53, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RAF Dumfries

[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of RAF Dumfries, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.dumfriesaviationmuseum.com/rafdumfries.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:50, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the history section from this article as most of it was copied and pasted from the reference above. It was a derivative work and needs to be rewritten. Unless of course, you have permission to use the text. Please pay attention to copyright and it's best to just not copy and paste text from website's into Wikipedia. Use your own words. See WP:COPYPASTE for more guidance on that. Given your talk page, it seems you have a problem with copyrights. Persistent violators will be blocked.--NortyNort (Holla) 01:44, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:2011 Tour of Britain in Dumfries 2.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:2011 Tour of Britain in Dumfries 2.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:05, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:2011 Tour of Britain in Dumfries 1.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:2011 Tour of Britain in Dumfries 1.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:06, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1989 Tour

[edit]

Hi Socheid. I saw that you added a lot of prose to the 1989 Tour de France article. Great work! It would be nice if you also would add your sources to the article, so readers can verify things that they don't believe. --EdgeNavidad (Talk · Contribs) 19:01, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2011–12 Queen of the South F.C. season

[edit]

Thanks, for editions to the season page, however I may have to remove the link to the player’s stats on the Queen of the South website as this link will expire, it also has been proven not to be accurate as it is in direct contraction of Queen of the South’s match reports. What I mean by that is that Ryan Smylie has played four league matches as a substitute as per QOS matches reports(& other sources) & yet he has been represented in their stats table as having only made three. Regards (★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★) 09:31, 8 November 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Queen of the South F.C. League History

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Queen of the South F.C. League History, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. --Njavallil ...Talk 2 Me 18:20, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Hi,

Can you spell out exactly what your concern is please?

Socheid (talk) 18:24, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

[edit]

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to User:Njavallil. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write practically anything you want. Please see the page to see the reasons. --Njavallil ...Talk 2 Me 18:29, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I never thought you would take it so serious!!!!!

[edit]

Wait!!! I thought you would take that as a joke, but you are Bold enough. (I was only testing to see if you were Bold). Now you may complaint to any other User or Administrator. Thanks for reading. --Njavallil ...Talk 2 Me 18:42, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My Point to Queen_of_the_South_F.C._League_History is clearly made there. Please visit that page for further information. --Njavallil ...Talk 2 Me 18:50, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have made my apologies in John's talkpage, so there is less chance in him taking any actions against me, and I'm sorry again if I had hurt your feelings. --Njavallil ...Talk 2 Me 19:02, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

[edit]

A kitten to say sorry

--Njavallil ...Talk 2 Me 19:03, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Ramones, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wayne Kramer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Peter Shilton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Wright (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Denny Johnstone

[edit]

The article Denny Johnstone has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 18:59, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Paul Lambert, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Icelandic, Ray McKinnon and Alex Rae (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

[edit]
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Guerillero | My Talk 19:23, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I reduced your block to time served per John's appeal on my talk page. Please try to get consensus per bold, revert, discuss before reinstating your changes. --Guerillero | My Talk 23:00, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've said more at my own user talk in reply to your earlier message. There are very few hard and fast rules in this community but repeatedly reverting the good faith efforts of others is an absolute bright line for getting blocked. Please read WP:3RR, WP:EDITWAR and WP:DR before re-entering the debate at Talk:Ramones. There is always a better way to improve an article, especially one that is in fairly good shape like that one. I can give you more focused guidance should you need it in the future. I am sorry I was too busy to help you in time to avoid your getting blocked. I would ask you to consider that I've slightly gone out on a limb to ask another admin to remit your block. I implicitly trust you not to make me regret this. --John (talk) 23:14, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jimmy Gallagher (sax) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jimmy Gallagher (sax) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Gallagher (sax) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Tassedethe (talk) 19:49, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Socheid. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Planernaya Railway Station

[edit]

Hello, Socheid,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Planernaya Railway Station should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Planernaya Railway Station .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Eddie Blick (talk) 00:43, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Socheid. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Socheid. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Malcolm Adams

[edit]
Notice

The article Malcolm Adams has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 15:52, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Malcolm Adams for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Malcolm Adams is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malcolm Adams until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 11:53, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gordon Holt

[edit]
Notice

The article Gordon Holt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable part-time footballer, fails NFOOTBALL and GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 12:05, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Iain Scott

[edit]
Notice

The article Iain Scott has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable ex-manager of part-time football team, fails NFOOTBALL and GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 12:07, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gordon Holt for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gordon Holt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gordon Holt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 12:24, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Iain Scott for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Iain Scott is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iain Scott until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 12:31, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Steven Degnan

[edit]
Notice

The article Steven Degnan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable footballer who played a few games in the Scottish second tier. Article sourced only with routine coverage and nothing focusing on the subject.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 14:40, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jordan Marshall

[edit]
Notice

The article Jordan Marshall has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. BlueberryIntoTheWild (talk) 14:19, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Socheid&oldid=1213682343"