User talk:Soccerstarter

Real mature. Must’ve taken you a long time to think of that one update you did for Tim Murphy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1016:B00F:6683:880C:6C8A:FD1E:EC89 (talk) 22:11, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 16:57, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tyler wiggins

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tyler wiggins requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. BIK89 (talk) 17:10, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Butterfly (September 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Whispering was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Butterfly and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Whispe ring 05:33, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Soccerstarter, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Whispe ring 05:33, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Butterfly (September 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Butterfly and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 12:28, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Timothy F. Murphy. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 22:09, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:2600:1016:B00F:6683:880C:6C8A:FD1E:EC89, you may be blocked from editing. MelanieN (talk) 22:46, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Butterfly (October 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Narutolovehinata5 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Butterfly and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 14:12, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Victor do Lamarque

Please quote relliable sources.
Please explain what you write, who are the people, why was he killed.
It was Russia at that time. Xx236 (talk) 12:55, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If you quote a book - how to find it, have you translated the title?
The list isn't any source.Xx236 (talk) 13:22, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please quote any source. It seems you have invented the person.Xx236 (talk) 13:23, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Victor do Lamarque

Hello Soccerstarter,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Victor do Lamarque for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Xx236 (talk) 13:34, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Victor do Lamarque

Hello, Soccerstarter. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Victor do Lamarque, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Xx236 (talk) 07:53, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits are disruptive

Your page Victor do Lamarque is a hoax. You may be blocked if you continue your destructive edits.Xx236 (talk) 07:56, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia — and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you.Xx236 (talk) 07:58, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Victor do Lamarque

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Victor do Lamarque requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MayureshK 09:51, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Titty Sprinkles

Titty Sprinkles Titty Sprinkles Titty Sprinkles Titty Titty Sprinkles Titty Sprinkles Titty Sprinkles Titty Sprinkles Titty Sprinkles Titty Sprinkles Titty Sprinkles Titty Sprinkles Titty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty SprinklesTitty Sprinkles Love em...

Proposed deletion of File:Wesley Consul the Pogi.jpg

The file File:Wesley Consul the Pogi.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Personal file, no foreseeable encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:42, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Butterfly concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Butterfly, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Butterfly

Hello, Soccerstarter. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Butterfly".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:01, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Butterfly concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Butterfly, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Butterfly

Hello, Soccerstarter. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Butterfly".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:27, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]