User talk:So47JaNa
So47JaNa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
There is no proof that my account is linked to any account because I use my own work, I reference my edits, and I certainly don't do any Sock puppetry. There is no evidence of an abuse of use, and I request an immediate unblocking. The administrator is naive and should have his/hers administration rights revoked because I have not violated any of wikipedia's code of conducts, I have contributed in an appropriate manner. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia whereby allows users to contribute freely in an appropriate manner, an administrator cannot simply disallow someone the right of use if they make an edit that they dislike or feel a particular way without a shred of evidence. It is therefore, I demand an immediate unblocking!... Materialisticscientist should have his/her rights removed indefinitely. For sock puppetry an administrator should provide proof. As I have committed no wrong, it is absolutely absurd and ridiculous that such a measure should be taken. As anyone can, delete, or remove content I have contributed, but blocking without reason is preposterous and defeats the purpose of Wikipedia. I have no link to any account other than this one!
Decline reason:
It's way too obvious. Please stop wasting everybody's time. Max Semenik (talk) 16:22, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
That is a pitiful and biased reasoning. It is pathetic how idiotic some of the reasons are. There is no link to any other account other than this one! I demand an imediate unblocking because there is no violatio of wrongdoing.
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.