User talk:Snarkout

Welcome!

Hello, Snarkout, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 20:03, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wold Newton family category

In your objection to this category, you mentioned that if Tarzan were categorized in the Kingdom Hearts characters cateogry or Richard Francis Burton were categorized in the Riverworld characters category, you would object. My question is why? I would support their inclusion in those categories if they appeared in the game/book/other media. It would show the further reachings of those characters. The additional categories would add a depth that hadn't been there before. I could care less about the origianl author's Sherlock Holmes. I find the Sherlock Holmes of the Wold Newton universe more interesting. I also find the concept of the Wold Newton universe stimulating. Without the Wold Newton universe category, those characters may not get any new interest. As I said in my defense of the category, I didn't know most of those characters existed until I saw them listed in the Wold Newton category which I found while looking at the Elizabeth Bennet article. Because I found Sherlock Holmes in this category, I may give Arthur Conan Doyle a chance. Before now, the only Sherlock Holmes I had read was Laurie R. King's Mary Russell series.

I ask you to change your vote, or at least answer on my talk page.

Thank you for reading.
Lady Aleena talk/contribs 08:05, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PS. List of Wold Newton Universe characters