User talk:SnapCount

Palin

Just an FYI, there isn't much to an argument when you say something like "We'll put it in when the spoofs of Obama are mentioned in his bio." Not every biography has to be the same. It's a pretty cry-baby argument. Grsz ^talk 16:28, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a look at the Weatherman/Terrorism RfC

Hi! This is a form notice sent to several editors who have contributed recently at the Bill Ayers page or talk page (sent in accordance with WP:CANVASS). A proposal has been made near the bottom of Talk:Weatherman (organization)/Terrorism RfC concerning the Bill Ayers article in connection with use of the word "terrorism" and discussion of it in the article. Other proposals have been made concerning similar articles, and a large amount of information about sources on this topic are available on the page. Please take a look and consider supporting or opposing some of the proposals. Thanks. -- Noroton (talk) 02:42, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, if you think "violent" is a better description for Ayers or Weatherman, please take another look at Talk:Bill Ayers#Ayers and violence. Thanks. -- Noroton (talk) 02:46, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you or any contributor to the Ayers entry feel that he will not be recognized for his activities with the Weathermen, be real. There is no way that he can unring the bell and even if people want, he cannot be disassociated from his Weathermen past. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.20.19.110 (talk) 23:48, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September, 2008

You seem to be edit warring on the Sarah Palin article.[1][2] Please use the article talk page to discuss disputed content additions, and do not repeatedly revert in disputed content. Thank you. Wikidemon (talk) 19:31, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bill Ayers

You are well aware of the ongoing discussion about use of the word "terrorist" (and derivatives) in Weather Underground related articles. I have reverted your use of the word in Bill Ayers as it is a BLP violation. Please allow the discussion to run its course before unilaterally deciding for yourself and adding the term to articles. -- Scjessey (talk) 20:42, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]