User talk:Snagglepuss24
Thanks for visiting my user page. I welcome any suggestions, corrective criticism, etc. on content that I have had a hand in modifying or creating.
Welcome
[edit]Hello, Snagglepuss24 and welcome to Wikipedia! It appears you are participating in a class project. If you haven't done so already, we encourage you to go through our training for students. Your instructor or professor may wish to set up a course page, if your class doesn't already have one.
If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Helpme}} before the question.
Before you create an article, make sure you understand what kind of articles are accepted here. Remember: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and while many topics are encyclopedic, some things are not.
It is highly recommended that you place this text: {{Educational assignment}} on the talk page of any articles you are working on as part of your Wikipedia-related course assignment. This will let other editors know this article is a subject of an educational assignment and should be treated accordingly.
We hope you like it here and encourage you to stay even after your assignment is finished! Lova Falk talk 06:03, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Psychology Barnstar | |
| Hi Snagglepuss, I am profoundly impressed by your great work on Cognitive psychology. Very well done indeed! Lova Falk talk 13:56, 14 April 2013 (UTC) |
either cognitive or ???
[edit]Hi Snagglepuss, I found an unfinished sentence in your addition to Cognitive psychology. in the section Personality psychology, you wrote: "Those five traits include neuroticism, extraversion, openness, conscientiousness, and agreeableness, and are all either cognitive" - and that's it. Now, either cognitive or... ??? I cut this sentence for now, but would you please reinsert a complete version? Thank you! Lova Falk talk 13:59, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Lova, thanks for your editorial work on my revisions to the cognitive psychology article. Looking back through my saved edits, I saw this fragment and honestly don't know what went on there. It's likely that I had some train of thought going and got side-tracked and never returned to that section. Thanks for cleaning it up for me. Snagglepuss24 (talk) 14:56, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
- Actually, if you don't remember what you intended to write, it's actually a bit unclear why the Big five should be mentioned in the cognitive psychology article...
- I will work on clarifying this and providing motivation for its inclusion. Snagglepuss24 (talk) 15:18, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
- Actually, if you don't remember what you intended to write, it's actually a bit unclear why the Big five should be mentioned in the cognitive psychology article...
- Hi Lova, thanks for your editorial work on my revisions to the cognitive psychology article. Looking back through my saved edits, I saw this fragment and honestly don't know what went on there. It's likely that I had some train of thought going and got side-tracked and never returned to that section. Thanks for cleaning it up for me. Snagglepuss24 (talk) 14:56, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
Cognitive psychology vs. cognitive science
[edit]And more question. You wrote: "Cognitive psychology envelopes a much broader scope, which has links to philosophy, linguistics, anthropology, neuroscience, and particularly with artificial intelligence. It could be said that cognitive science provides the database of information that fuels the theory from which cognitive psychologists operate."
I think you might have made a mistake and should have written: "Cognitive science envelopes a much broader scope, which has links to philosophy, linguistics, anthropology, neuroscience, and particularly with artificial intelligence. It could be said that cognitive science provides the database of information that fuels the theory from which cognitive psychologists operate."
Please change this if I am correct! Lova Falk talk 14:15, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
- You are absolutely correct in assuming that this was intended to read cognitive science envelopes... I have rectified this typo. Thanks once again for your help. Thank you very much also for the barnstar. I have really enjoyed working on the article and look forward to being able to help out on other articles the future. Snagglepuss24 (talk) 15:04, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
- Great!
You might like to join Wikipedia:WikiProject Psychology. The talk page of this project is also a good place for finding help with psychology articles. Lova Falk talk 15:07, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
- Done!
- Done!
- Great!
- You are absolutely correct in assuming that this was intended to read cognitive science envelopes... I have rectified this typo. Thanks once again for your help. Thank you very much also for the barnstar. I have really enjoyed working on the article and look forward to being able to help out on other articles the future. Snagglepuss24 (talk) 15:04, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]
Message added 16:28, 6 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.