User talk:Smithkalra1234

April 2020

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Qatar. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Don't do citation spamming like you did here [1] and here [2] otherwise you may be blocked from editing wikipedia. Mayankj429 (talk) 09:59, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Visa policy of Uganda, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. Do not spam citation with promotional content as you did here [3] otherwise you may be blocked for violating policies of wikipedia. Mayankj429 (talk) 10:06, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Visa requirements for French citizens. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. This is forth time you have spammed citation in an article. This the edit [4] in which you have spammed this time. Mayankj429 (talk) 03:44, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:44, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]