Jump to content

User talk:Cirt

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Smee)
WikiProject Good Articles: Open Tasks
This project identifies, organizes and improves good articles on Wikipedia.
AFD/TT-7T-8T-2RelistedAFDOWP:DELSORT: Sexuality and gender, Law, Internet, News, MedicineAFD tool linksWP:DRVWP:MFDAIVRFUBUAA/CATRFPPPERCSDABFARFAC urgentsTFARRSNBLPNFTNGAN Topic lists • Article alerts: Freedom of speechHuman rightsJournalismSexology and sexualityLGBT studiesFeminismWomenGender StudiesWomen artistsWomen's HistoryWomen scientistsWomen writersMedicineLawInternetInternet cultureComedyU.S. Supreme Court cases
Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
RfA candidate S O N S % Status Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
Sennecaster 223 0 0 100 Open 17:20, 25 December 2024 21 hours no report

Shout out for Social Justice Warrior article

[edit]

Hi Cirt, A quick note to say that I gave you a shout out for your work on the "Social Justice Warrior" Wikipedia article. My review of the article is part of the Wackipedia series on The Outline.

Wackipedia - Social Justice Warrior

Austin Powell

[edit]

Orphaned non-free image File:Scientology The Now Religion.gif

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Scientology The Now Religion.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Blown for Good

[edit]

Blown for Good has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:31, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Portland Monthly

[edit]

Portland Monthly has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:47, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]