User talk:Smartyllama/Archive 61
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Smartyllama. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 55 | ← | Archive 59 | Archive 60 | Archive 61 | Archive 62 | Archive 63 |
Patrick Tchoungui
You're right about the club he allegedly played for being in the top division that season (when I searched 2009–10 Croatian First Football League for NK Pula it doesn't come up, but it turns out the club had already been renamed Istra by then). However, on further inspection, I believe this may be another hoax article (like Maheep Riar, created by the same editor) as searching for "Patrick Tchoungui" and either Pula or Istra returns zero results outside of Wikipedia or mirror sites. I'll nominate it for speedy deletion. Number 57 14:38, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Number 57: I removed the speedy. A Google reverse image search shows the photo is probably of someone with this name. It may still be a hoax, but I don't think it's a blatant one, so take it to AfD and give us seven days to sort it out. Smartyllama (talk) 14:44, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- I restored the deletion tag as the photo that comes up of this person is the same photo in the article and hosted on WP. So it would be like saying "can't be a hoax because it's on WP!" CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:46, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Chrissymad: It also pulls up a Facebook profile of someone with this name, which unfortunately I can't view to see what it says because it's blocked by my office firewall. Can you take a look at it before this gets speedied if that's what you insist on doing? Smartyllama (talk) 14:47, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- I saw the Facebook photo but as it's a private profile and in this context, it's still a hoax. It's not an "official" page or even a fan created page, simply a random guy's profile, who apparently likes soccer and plays for what appears to be a social league. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:53, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- Ah, OK. Is that what the YouTube videos show too? I can't view them right now, but if they confirm that he's just a rec league player trying to make himself into something more than he is, I'm OK with a speedy. Smartyllama (talk) 14:53, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- Everything I've found containing variations of this name are social media that really don't support anything other than there are people named Patrick Tchoungui but none of them appear to be a pro at much of anything ;) He's definitely a rec/social league player unless I'm missing something.CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:00, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- I'll also be the first to admit that I'm not the most knowledgeable about Footy or sports in general but I did quite a bit of digging in the last 40 minutes and not a single claim in the article pans out, for what it's worth. I've searched papers as well and the only time where his name comes up in association with any notable league is on a mirror site or a random logo he slapped on an over-edited video on YT. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:11, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- Ah, OK. Is that what the YouTube videos show too? I can't view them right now, but if they confirm that he's just a rec league player trying to make himself into something more than he is, I'm OK with a speedy. Smartyllama (talk) 14:53, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- I saw the Facebook photo but as it's a private profile and in this context, it's still a hoax. It's not an "official" page or even a fan created page, simply a random guy's profile, who apparently likes soccer and plays for what appears to be a social league. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:53, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Chrissymad: It also pulls up a Facebook profile of someone with this name, which unfortunately I can't view to see what it says because it's blocked by my office firewall. Can you take a look at it before this gets speedied if that's what you insist on doing? Smartyllama (talk) 14:47, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
Please stop
"Like navigation templates, infoboxes should avoid flag icons. " Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 18:19, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Sportsfan 1234: Read the next line. "Examples of acceptable exceptions include infobox templates for military conflicts and infoboxes including international competitions, such as FIFA World Cup or the Olympic Games." The Volleyball World Championship is an international competition, hence the use of flags is acceptable. You have been told this before, and yet keep reverting and removing. You are the one who needs to knock it off. Smartyllama (talk) 18:28, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- I have started a discussion on the talk page. Please discuss there rather than continue to edit war. Thanks. Smartyllama (talk) 18:31, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 October 2018
- From the editor: Is this the new normal?
- News and notes: European copyright law moves forward
- In the media: Knowledge under fire
- Discussion report: Interface Admin policy proposal, part 2
- Arbitration report: A quiet month for Arbcom
- Technology report: Paying attention to your mobile
- Gallery: A pat on the back
- Recent research: How talk page use has changed since 2005; censorship shocks lead to centralization; is vandalism caused by workplace boredom?
- Humour: Signpost Crossword Puzzle
- Essay: Expressing thanks
Welcome to the Months of African Cinema!
Greetings!
The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which has been dedicated to improving contents that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.
This is a global online edit-a-thon, which is happening in at least 5 language editions of Wikipedia, including the English Wikipedia! Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section, if you haven't done so already.
On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing Users who are able to achieve the following:
- Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
- Country Winners
- Diversity winner
- High quality contributors
- Gender-gap fillers
- Page improvers
- Wikidata Translators
For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 22:50, 03 October 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 October 2018
- From the editors: The Signpost is still afloat, just barely
- News and notes: WMF gets a million bucks
- In the media: Bans, celebs, and bias
- Discussion report: Mediation Committee and proposed deletion reform
- Traffic report: Unsurprisingly, sport leads the field – or the ring
- Technology report: Bots galore!
- Special report: NPP needs you
- Special report 2: Now Wikidata is six
- In focus: Alexa
- Gallery: Out of this world!
- Recent research: Wikimedia Commons worth $28.9 billion
- Humour: Talk page humour
- Opinion: Strickland incident
- From the archives: The Gardner Interview
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Smartyllama. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 December 2018
- From the editor: Time for a truce
- Special report: The Christmas wishlist
- Discussion report: Farewell, Mediation Committee
- Arbitration report: A long break ends
- Traffic report: Queen reigns for four weeks straight
- Gallery: Intersections
- From the archives: Ars longa, vita brevis
Discussion at Talk:Passengers of the RMS Titanic
I'd like to invite editors who participated in the deletion discussion to give their input at article talk. There was considerable interest in cleaning up this article in one way or another, but there have been few responses to my proposal to trim the passenger lists. Alternative proposals are certainly welcome as well; I'm hoping that we can build some sort of consensus for the scope and direction of the article moving forward. Thanks –dlthewave ☎ 21:57, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of J. Millard Tawes Gymnasium for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article J. Millard Tawes Gymnasium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. Millard Tawes Gymnasium until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Andrewgprout (talk) 16:47, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Evidence that Social media addiction is a hijacked redirect
[1] Kamafa Delgato (Lojbanist)Styrofoam is not made from kittens. 18:37, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Lojbanist: Discuss it at AfD. Don't hijack an AfD against consensus. Smartyllama (talk) 18:38, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 December 2018
- From the editors: Where to draw the line in reporting?
- News and notes: Some wishes do come true
- In the media: Political hijinks
- Discussion report: A new record low for RfA
- WikiProject report: Articlegenesis
- Arbitration report: Year ends with one active case
- Traffic report: Queen dethroned by U.S. presidents
- Gallery: Sun and Moon, water and stone
- Blog: News from the WMF
- Humour: I believe in Bigfoot
- Essay: Requests for medication
- From the archives: Compromised admin accounts – again
Welcome to the 2019 WikiCup!
Hello and Happy New Year!
Welcome to the 2019 WikiCup, the competition begins today. If you have already joined, your submission page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and we will set up your submissions page. One important rule to remember is that only content on which you have completed significant work during 2019, and which you have nominated this year, is eligible for points in the competition, the judges will be checking! Any questions should be directed to one of the judges, or left on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will make it to round 2. Good luck! The judges for the WikiCup are Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email), Vanamonde93 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:14, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 January 2019
- Op-Ed: Random Rewards Rejected
- News and notes: WMF staff turntable continues to spin; Endowment gets more cash; RfA continues to be a pit of steely knives
- Discussion report: The future of the reference desk
- Featured content: Don't miss your great opportunity
- Arbitration report: An admin under the microscope
- Traffic report: Death, royals and superheroes: Avengers, Black Panther
- Technology report: When broken is easily fixed
- News from the WMF: News from WMF
- Recent research: Ad revenue from reused Wikipedia articles; are Wikipedia researchers asking the right questions?
- Essay: How
- Humour: Village pump
- From the archives: An editorial board that includes you
The Signpost: 28 February 2019
- From the editors: Help wanted (still)
- News and notes: Front-page issues for the community
- Discussion report: Talking about talk pages
- Featured content: Conquest, War, Famine, Death, and more!
- Arbitration report: A quiet month for Arbitration Committee
- Traffic report: Binge-watching
- Technology report: Tool labs casters-up
- Gallery: Signed with pride
- From the archives: New group aims to promote Wiki-Love
- Humour: Pesky Pronouns
AfC plus various bits
Hi. I've added you to the AfC reviewers' list. Additionally, I've added a few bits like new page patroller. If you need help in understanding any of the bits I've added, feel free to reach out. Thanks, Lourdes 00:58, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
Request on 02:53:22, 8 March 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Zaneingram
- Zaneingram (talk · contribs)
Zaneingram (talk) 02:53, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
Alright first of all, there was no punctuation problems for my article, secondly, the time until next season has nothing to do with me being able to post the article or not because everything I said is true. All of the coaches have contract renewals and have been hot on the recruiting trail so we know they are coming back and we know they are going to be in the ACC so virtually there is no problem with my article.
You clearly are someone who likes to feel important and I know you are supposed to avoid personal attacks but its just hard when you clearly made these "suggestions" to be a know it all because everything you said was nonsense and then you threw in the false punctuation issue to try to make your argument credible, give me a break.
- @Zaneingram: Thanks for the inquiry. With regards to the punctuation issue, I said there was an issue with capitalization, not punctuation. The article should be called 2019-20 Pittsburgh Panthers men's basketball team. However, if that were the only issue, I'd have approved it and moved the article myself. The main issue is that it's simply too soon, the current season isn't even over yet, the coaches could get fired or hired by another school, we know nothing about recruits or schedules or anything like that, and the current state of the article is not such that it would survive an AfD. I suggest you compare it to other season articles to see what is required, and most of that information is simply unavailable at this time. Smartyllama (talk) 13:54, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 March 2019
- From the editors: Getting serious about humor
- News and notes: Blackouts fail to stop EU Copyright Directive
- In the media: Women's history month
- Discussion report: Portal debates continue, Prespa agreement aftermath, WMF seeks a rebranding
- Featured content: Out of this world
- Arbitration report: The Tides of March at ARBCOM
- Traffic report: Exultations and tribulations
- Technology report: New section suggestions and sitewide styles
- News from the WMF: The WMF's take on the new EU Copyright Directive
- Recent research: Barnstar-like awards increase new editor retention
- From the archives: Esperanza organization disbanded after deletion discussion
- Humour: The Epistolary of Arthur 37
- Op-Ed: Pro and Con: Has gun violence been improperly excluded from gun articles?
- In focus: The Wikipedia SourceWatch
- Special report: Wiki Loves (50 Years of) Pride
- Community view: Wikipedia's response to the New Zealand mosque shootings