User talk:Slysplace/Archives/2008/March

Plantagenets

Unluckily, the pages for some Plantagenets contained some faults. That's sad. But, it seems, you have no clue about european culture, tradition and history. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.109.108.137 (talk) 20:56, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

One does not need a clue to recognize bad editing, furthermore faults much like beauty are often in the eye of the beholder! Your edits regarding Henry II of England (and not in House of Plantagenet article) were not substantial and appeared disruptive. If you had any credibility you would have created an account, logged in and then signed your message above. Slysplace ^{talk ♫} 21:59, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

BELOW COMMENT COPPIED FROM Talk:Henry II of England#Plantagenet ^{(where you also didnt sign your message)}

I think the Admin/User Slysplace has not much knowledege about the history of the Plantagenet. That's sad for the reputation of Wikipedia. Though Wikipedia is a great site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.109.108.137 (talk) 21:18, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm not an admin and what does adding <br /> awhile to the end of dates continually have to do with "Plantagenet" or the house of, your edits added no quality to the article and fit the profile of test edits better suited for the Wikipedia:Sandbox next time try logging in to make serious contributions Slysplace ^{talk ♫} 21:52, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Green Mountain High School edits

Hey, just wanted to check and see why the GMHS page edits are being reverted. Everything in there is true, it's not vandalism or anything. UNSIGNED BY Thespungo (Talk | contribs) at 19:43, 4 March 2008.

First thank you for allowing ME to sign YOUR message for you.

Secondly if you want your edits to be taken seriously you should log in before you make them and not include inline links to external images. Slysplace ^{talk ♫} 01:09, 5 March 2008 (UTC)