User talk:Sleeveman

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the "sandbox" rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Dougweller (talk) 11:09, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks Doug--Sleeveman (talk) 08:04, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Original research

Please note that Wikipedia is not a place for your original research or synthesis. Ghmyrtle (talk) 07:55, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you are talking about my last edit i think you need to bank a few ice cubes and take another look,,,i referenced the cunt out of it--Sleeveman (talk) 08:03, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The problem now is not to do with the references, but to your interpretation of them. So far as I can see, none of the references share your interpretation of "different levels of pedigree". That seems to be something you've invented, and therefore it will be removed. You also need to be aware of policy on edit warring, civility, and on not attacking other editors. And spelling. Ghmyrtle (talk) 08:06, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Have you noticed that the Irish do not even care to contemplate British history, never mind taking the time to try and textually downplay your account of your own history,we simply don't give a shit about your history, if you look at any article relating to the Irish you will see a psychotic volume of British or commonwealth editors trying to downplay the textual material, why?--Sleeveman (talk) 09:12, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTFORUM. Ghmyrtle (talk) 09:34, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok darling--Sleeveman (talk) 02:09, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Snow Dropping

Hello, Sleeveman. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Snow Dropping, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vanjagenije (talk) 12:04, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Snow Dropping, you may be blocked from editing. Clearly vandalism, not a real article. Dougweller (talk) 19:38, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I liked that article, it was factually informative and funny at the same time,i cant see the harm--Sleeveman (talk) 02:08, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sleeveman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hey men, Ive got four kids to feed--Sleeveman (talk) 5:56 am, Today (UTC+0)

Decline reason:

Disruptive and/or obviously frivolous unblock requests will not be considered. Please read the guide to appeals before making any future unblock requests. Repeated inappropriate unblock requests will result in the removal of your talkpage access. Yunshui 雲‍水 08:54, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Correct response:

What happened to the fifth?--Sleeveman (talk) 12:34, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]