User talk:Slap the fish

Template:IrishRivers

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with {{#if:Template:IrishRivers|the page welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Many thanks. « Keith ^t/_e » 18:24, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, um... OK...

I just reverted your talk page before realizing that you were the one who replaced your own talk page with "Fuck", so I'm not sure if that revert was okay or not... sorry for any inconvenience. Vic₂₂₆ 19:12, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Messing around with my user page

I was able to revert the changes you made to my user page -- it's actually pretty easy to fix that kind of thing. In fact, it was my first experiment with reversion, so it worked out fine; thank you (I guess). What amused me most was that I had just grabbed a couple of those user boxes from somebody else's user page about an hour before you did the same thing with mine. Anyway, no harm. Wik on. atakdoug 19:09, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop editing other peoples user pages - use the talk page for a message

Please do not introduce any form of vandalism to the userpages of other users, as you did to User:Nv8200p. Thank you.--EarthPerson 20:29, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

stop adding things that I dont understand

Jack-offism

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. (aeropagitica) 20:57, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me but you wrote on my talk page dont introduce vandalism. what vandalism did i do Slap the fish 20:59, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Writing empty articles such as Jack-offism with edit summaries containing 'please don't delete' is not considered a constructive way of contributing to the encyclopedia. Empty articles do not serve researchers and are open to being speedily deleted in order not to waste peoples' time in visiting them. Develop your articles in a user sub-page sandbox and publish them when they are ready if you do not have enough time to develop what you have to say in to a stub. (aeropagitica) 21:04, 19 April 2007 (UTC) OH ok sorry[reply]

Images on your user page

This edit constitutes a personal attack against User:Nv8200p. Please remove it. And you need to remove the Image:Clown.gif from your user page as it is copyrighted. Please look over WP:Userpage for what is allowed and what is not. Thanks. --EarthPerson 20:12, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:Slap_the_fish"

Continued personal attacks

Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

This edit is another personal attack by you this time against User:Angr. You need to stop doing this. --EarthPerson 21:29, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

It has become apparent that your account is only being used for personal attacks and harassment, so it has been blocked indefinitely.

EVula // talk // ☯ // 22:21, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Slap the fish (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't mean to. Please I'll delete all the harasses on my user page I just want to be able to edit things. I'll become a good editor. How long untill im unbanned?

Decline reason:

As this account has primarily been used to harass other users, there is no plan to ever unblock you. Harassment is treated very seriously here. — Yamla 17:25, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Slap the fish (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please just give me one more chance. surely thats how all good editors start out, by making stupid edits. I promise I wont do it again I promise Please?

Decline reason:

Per above — WinHunter ^(talk) 20:23, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.