User talk:Skinduptruk

Welcome!

Hello, Skinduptruk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

sound from ultrasound

Hi Skinduptruk, thank you for the contribution to Sound from ultrasound! Do you have a link or a reference to your thesis? We need to confirm that it was your text to donate (unfortunately we do have to ensure we're respecting copyright). Best, Neil ☎ 09:56, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Neil, I'm sorry it took some ~9+1/2 years for me to see this comment! I will ask my Uni about copyright etc ;)

Skinduptruk (talk) 09:22, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kurt Pudniks (May 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

While I'm having some difficulty accessing all of the references online, the majority of them appear to be a) routine politics coverage, and b) all very local coverage. Seeing as Pudniks was not elected, this means he fails WP:NPOL. If national or international sources talk about him, then it becomes a different story, but so far I'm not seeing it. Please add additional independent reliable sources that discuss the subject in detail.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kurt Pudniks and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 00:59, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kurt Pudniks (August 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jmcgnh was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Resubmitting without addressing the problems already pointed out is unlikely to get a different result. Lots of reviewers have looked at this submission by now and, as evidenced by their lack of action, agree with the initial review by Primefac.

In your discussions at the Teahouse and Primefac's talk page, you have made the general claim that Pudnicks meets a notability standard other than the one for political office holders. The best thing that you could do to help your case is to select something like three specific references that you think establish this notability and ask at the AfC Help Desk for an evaluation. Just about any coverage that was based on the political campaign would not meet this standard, no matter how innovative and unusual the campaign's tactics were. If Pudnick has other national-level coverage unrelated to the political campaign, that would be ideal.

Notability is the first hurdle that any subject must get past in order for there to be a Wikipedia article. It looks like the rest of your content is well-sprinkled with inline refs and the overall tone of the submission is not excessively promotional. You should not refer to the subject as "Kurt" in the body.

Finally, about your username. Once I looked at it as a backwards spelling of the subject's name, it raised the question of whether you might have a conflict of interest. You should read that policy and the related one about autobiographies to ensure you are in compliance.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kurt Pudniks and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:17, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Skinduptruk, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:17, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declare any connection

Hello, Skinduptruk. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Draft:Kurt Pudniks, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:06, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I left a message on your talk page. Skinduptruk (talk) 12:33, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kurt Pudniks (September 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Aguyintobooks was:

It is no better than before.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kurt Pudniks and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Α Guy into Books™ § (Message) - 15:14, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kurt Pudniks (September 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Aguyintobooks was:

I just emailed my fam the monthly update on my autobio wikipedia page draft being rejected all the time by NYC wikipedia editor cucks*... and then my sis went into full snowflake Blizzard of Aus mode!! 😝

SEPTEMBER 2017

another editor, another piss-weak review (and rejection)...

here is that main page link again ;) https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:Kurt_Pudniks

the issue seems to be them silently (perhaps deliberately?) misquoting the wiki policy and making unexplained assertions from there...

however, my strategy of drawing their argument out over time, such that a pattern of behaviour can be observed (in aggregation) across all of the editors' "talk" pages on wiki, seems to be working well!

I cannot quite completely disagree with your arguments, the policy is unclear, however it is the case that you are non-notable by the convention set according to community consensus and that you have a undisclosed Conflict of Interest. Repeated resubmission will not help much here, your best option is to take up the issue on the policy board. where a discussion has already started.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kurt Pudniks and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

--- Α Guy Into Books™ § (Message) - 07:01, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

COI follow up

I have noticed what you wrote on your userpage, (which is a very good writeup, well done for reading the policy) you should also add a {{UserboxCOI}} template, as this is the ordinary way of doing it. It has parameters so should be used like: {{UserboxCOI|1=Draft:Kurt Pudniks|2=Kurt Pudniks}}. --- Α Guy Into Books™ § (Message) - 12:40, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Done! Skinduptruk (talk) 08:44, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kurt Pudniks (October 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

None of the sources included feature in depth coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kurt Pudniks and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:46, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kurt Pudniks (October 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of the sources are local to Cairns and none have the depth required for notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kurt Pudniks and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 08:39, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kurt Pudniks portrait Cairns QLD 2016 (photo by Jen Frei).jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kurt Pudniks portrait Cairns QLD 2016 (photo by Jen Frei).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kurt Pudniks

Hello, Skinduptruk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kurt Pudniks".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 15:02, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]