User talk:Skgunnell

This is my short feedback on your wiki sandbox.

1. Is the web page suitable for first-time/general users as well as for those looking to understand the topic in more detail? You nailed this IMO. I like how your background page was general information on the GRIP and you focused more on Fraser Syndrome in detail

2. Is there a logical flow to the page? Yes your section itself has logical flow and it also fits well to the GRIP wiki page.

3. Do the contents of each section justify its length? Yes

4. Has a particular section been over-emphasized or under-emphasized compared to others? No

5. Does the sandbox satisfy the aims/objectives listed in their outline? Yes the sandbox focuses on the role of GRIP1 on Fraser Syndrome.

6. Are all the important terms linked to their respective Wikipedia pages for further reference? Yes

7. Do the images add to the educational value of the article? I like the image you currently have. It would have been helpful to see another image that shows the molecular mechanisms of GRIP1 and how it effects Fraser Syndrome. This will help me better understand what is going on in the actual body of the text.

8. Are the references relevant and integrated well into the article? Yes

9. Rate the overall presentation of the webpage. Check for typos, hard-to-read images and equations or syntax errors. Great quality webpage. It looks like you already uploaded things too.

10. Does the website satisfy all the assigned criteria (a minimum of one section, one figure, and three references per team member)? Yes

Overall score: 2/2

Wontak --------

Skgunnell, thank you for the review, it was very helpful! I finished making the edits you suggested, would you mind reading through it really quick, nothing in depth, just to see if it makes sense and there aren't any glaring mistakes? Thank you again! Kajax3 (talk) 02:09, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I just wanted to let you know that in the next day or two I will be separating my contributions to go into 3 different subheadings in the two articles I posted, and I will try to label clearly in my sandbox where everything is going. But you don't have to wait until I do that to review me if you want to do your review now. Just know that that is the plan when you do the review! Thanks, if you have and questions let me know. Kajax3 (talk) 03:58, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Skgunnell! I added links to the two pages I will be adding to, but you should always just be able to click the sandbox link next to my name to take you to what my actual contributions will be. I am going to break up my work and add to two different pages, but my sandbox won't reflect those different sections until probably tomorrow or late tonight. Thank you for trying to critique me so soon. Kajax3 (talk) 20:40, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: GRIP1 (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Technical 13 was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article on the same subject. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:GRIP1 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(e • t • c)} 15:55, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Skgunnell, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(e • t • c)} 15:55, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:GRIP1 concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:GRIP1, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:GRIP1

Hello, Skgunnell. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "GRIP1".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:GRIP1}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 12:00, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]