User talk:Sixtyn

Welcome!

Hello, Sixtyn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Vsmith (talk) 12:15, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In your recent edit to Biochemistry you provided a reference to Elekofehinti et al. (2012), however the reference is incomplete as no journal name is provided. Please complete the reference. Thanks, Vsmith (talk) 12:15, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sixtyn, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi Sixtyn!! You're invited to play The Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive game to become a great contributor to Wikipedia. It's a fun interstellar journey--learn how to edit Wikipedia in about an hour. We hope to see you there!

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:32, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of DragonBASIC

Hello. I wanted to let you know that I have removed the speedy deletion tag you placed at DragonBASIC. When you tag a page for speedy deletion you have to specify one of the criteria for speedy deletion to clarify why you think that the page should be removed. And the warning template in the footer of the pink deletion tag is meant to be put on the talk page of the user who created page, not on the article talk page.

Valid reasons for speedy deletion can be insignificance (for persons, organisations, companies and web content only), obvious vandalism, pages created to attack or disparage a person, unambigious advertising/spamming, and others. Normally, once a speedy deletion request has been declined, we cannot nominate a page for speedy deletion again but will to propose it for deletion which involves an evaluation period of several days before the page is actually deleted or kept. You may now want to use {{subst:prod|<your reason for deletion>}} at DragonBASIC to explain why you think the page should go.

Happy editing, De728631 (talk) 21:52, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Isaacatm, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. jni (talk) 16:41, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked you from editing to prevent unconstructive edits while I review your contribs. Dloh cierekim 17:46, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This edit is troubling I have unblocked while the SSI continues. Cheers, and happy editing. Dloh cierekim 18:00, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 01:12, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sixtyn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

hi admin. I want to use this medium to show my sadness over the block of my user sixtyn. I had clearly stated here that am innocent of the allegations,that I have no reason to create multiple account to violate wikipedia. I want to quickly notify you that there is a clear difference between olatunde olalekan and Olatunde Isaac. One is a notable biochemist from Nigeria(I mean Olatunde Isaac) who was known for dacryodes edulis. Olatunde olalekan is a non notable researcher. But you mis-quoted me in your coment that I said olatunde is not notable yet I went ahead to include him In the list of notable biochemist and that is contrary to my view because I added the notable Olatunde Isaac to the list of notable biochemist and contrary to the one u felt:olatunde olalekan. And I want to also draw your attention to the fact that there are thousands of olatunde olalekan and Olatunde Isaac all over the world,in diferent field,and don't because of only one in one thousand of olatunde olalekan block the creation or any user who contributed to any articles related to olatunde. Its true that I contributed to solanum anguivi created by biomolecules as you have stated here. Solanum anguivi is an article like any other articles on wikipedia which any editor can edit irrespective of who created it or contributed to it.regarding the issue of Ip I said and u accused me of why I talk about IP if am not connected with isaacatm. Am not just blabbing here withought reading through the reasons why they were accused. And one of the reasons is the Ip they share in common. Fellow wikipedian,let m Remind you that we all live and use wikipedia from diferent part of the world. Some live in Develop country while others live in developing country and its not all users that have access to his/her personal computer devices hence there is need to visit a public/comercial browsing center with an unprotected Ip. And as regards my destructive edit. I promise to learn more about editting so that the same mistake will not repeat itself. Please kindly unblock me so that I can make a significant contributions to our world leading encyclopedia(wikipedia).(Sixtyn (talk) 08:55, 8 December 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed abuse of multiple accounts. —DoRD (talk) 18:09, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.