User talk:SixMillionStrong

SixMillionStrong, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi SixMillionStrong! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SixMillionStrong. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 01:24, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SixMillionStrong (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Uh, yeah. I use a public IP, it is not private, so to ban all people because of what you perceive as the actions as one is selfish. When will the "ban" be lifted SixMillionStrong (talk) 07:27, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The block will not be lifted until you convince us you understand what you did wrong and convince us you won't repeat that. Yamla (talk) 10:25, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SixMillionStrong (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yeah I won't. It's all good. SixMillionStrong (talk) 11:00, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

To cite Yamla: The block will not be lifted until you convince us you understand what you did wrong and convince us you won't repeat that. Vanjagenije (talk) 11:20, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SixMillionStrong (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

When you asked if I'd break the rules, I replied "I won't" and that things are "all good" - which means I fully understand what you're saying. Hope that cleared things up for you. SixMillionStrong (talk) 11:31, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You clearly don't understand the reasoning for the block, nor why your actions led to it. That last response isn't nearly enough to overturn the block. RickinBaltimore (talk) 12:51, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SixMillionStrong (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yes I do. I've made that clear several times. You asked me to acknowledge I understand what happened and the consequences. I have done so. The appropriate thing to do is to undo the block as you suggested earlier. This is not an argument or a debate, I've done what was asked of me. SixMillionStrong (talk) 19:56, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Repeating what amounts to, "Yeah, I get it", isn't exactly convincing, is it? The sockpuppetry evidence, which is incontrovertible, has not been addressed, so there will be no unblocking. —DoRD (talk) 12:04, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have revoked talk page access. An admin will be along shortly to review your most recent unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 20:13, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]