User talk:Sivasuryaprasand

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for contributing edits that were made in good faith, but have been deemed not to contribute positively to the article. These edits have thus been reverted. Wikipedia's page on unacceptable additions may explain why. If you'd like to experiment with the syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

Some good links for newcomers are:

Help contents – the main help page.
Quick guide – a "cheatsheet" listing the main editing commands.
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to create your first article
Tutorial
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out the Teahouse, ask the Help Desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Once again, welcome! - SUN EYE 1 15:17, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Sattai Duraimurugan. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. - SUN EYE 1 15:05, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear SUN EYE, I am not adding any additional information to Sattai Duraimurugan, what ever i have posted are facts. Was Saatai durai murugan was proved guilt? they why you are updating the personal detail in deframing way? it is unfair brother. I too have Telugu, Malayalam friends. NTK is not opposing the other lingustic people, they are just trying to show up the faces of DMK and Congress who did nothing in ellam war and just calling themselves as tamils and ruling tamil nadu with fake promises. Sivasuryaprasand (talk) 15:13, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. - SUN EYE 1 15:06, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Sattai Duraimurugan. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - SUN EYE 1 15:07, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at Sattai Duraimurugan. Notrealname1234 (talk) 15:30, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Sivasuryaprasand

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Sivasuryaprasand requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Heart ^(talk) 15:37, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have declined the speedy delete and removed some information from your user page. Please do not re-include this information. PhilKnight (talk) 15:40, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Phil, Thanks for the kind support. Much appreciated. Is not fair to hold my Contact information on the Userpage to maintain 'Trust' and 'Transparency' please? Sivasuryaprasand (talk) 15:49, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 15:47, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @philknight, Please see there are soo many fake profiles tring to impersonate as Wikipedia officials. Kindly help to stop the vandalism against the Sattai Duraimurugan - Wikipedia page please.

Kind regards,

siva Arivalagan Sivasuryaprasand (talk) 15:52, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23 this is unfair Sivasuryaprasand (talk) 16:05, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for removing wrong contents of Saatai Duraimurugan. Kindly unblock my account. I would stop updating this page. Sivasuryaprasand (talk) 16:09, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what you're talking about. I never "removed" any material from Sattai Duraimurugan. I never even edited the article.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:59, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23 any thoughts? Notrealname1234 (talk) 16:59, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sivasuryaprasand (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Team, I have not updated the page with false information. Kindly unblock me Sivasuryaprasand (talk) 21:17, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Aoidh (talk) 00:18, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.