Jump to content

User talk:PatrickDahWoo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Sir Sputnikk)

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Liz Read! Talk! 18:39, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Sir Sputnikk", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it is the same username as an administrator, Sir Sputnik. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. EthanGaming7640 16:35, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. I've requested a new username. Thank you.Sir Sputnikk (talk) 17:23, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. I've requested a new username. Thank you.Sir Sputnikk (talk) 17:24, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. I've requested a new username. Thank you.Sir Sputnikk (talk) 17:24, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo
Hello! PatrickDahWoo, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 18:39, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Buysomebananas per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Buysomebananas. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  --Blablubbs (talk) 06:37, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PatrickDahWoo (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This account is not for illegitimate purpose, I used a userbox on my user page that says you should correct me if I'm wrong, not just blocking me without cautions. Please unblock my account. Thank you PatrickDahWoo (talk) 13:49, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 13:50, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PatrickDahWoo (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

the block is no longer necessary because I have understood what i have been blocked for, I will no longer cause damage or disruption, instead, I'll make useful contributions. PatrickDahWoo (talk) 14:05, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This just repeats our words back to us, and does not demonstrate an understanding of the reason for the block, or tell us what will be different going forward. As such, I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 15:21, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.