Jump to content

User talk:Simpsun728

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nomination of QC Royals for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article QC Royals is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QC Royals until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

EnPassant♟♙ (talk) 16:44, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, EnPassant, I see you tagged my article for deletion because the club is "non-notable". I disagree with this idea because this club is very engaged with both Stumptown AC and CLT FC. as of now, the club is Stumptown AC's only supporters group and has been named as such by the team's official IG account. Furthermore, the group is already in talks with CLT FC to discuss plans of further collaboration. Keeping the article is therefore encyclopedic and within Wikis guidelines. Please let me know if you'd like more sources and I would be happy to provide them to you. Thank you for the work you do! Simpsun728 (talk) 16:58, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Simpsun728 (I assume), I recommend you log back into your account as to make it plain to see where each comment is coming from and not publicly reveal your IP address. As far as the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QC Royals goes, it will be closed after a minimum of seven days, during which you have time to continue to improve the article, though I should caution you that I personally don't think it likely that this group will meet the notability criteria put forth at WP:ORGCRIT. AngryHarpy‍talk 17:05, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi AngryHarpy- thank you for letting me know about my ISP. I have removed it. I appreciate the criticism as well. I disagree about yours and EnPassant's assessments about the group's notability because other supporters' groups who have had even less notability than this one have remained on wikipedia, most notably the Dallas Beer Guardians of Dallas FC,[1], who do not hide the fact that they are a social club. I do not believe that this group is any different. Please let me know what sources the community would like for me to provide to legitimate my claims. Thank you! Simpsun728 (talk) 17:20, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You can find guidelines for the type of sources we're looking for at the link above (WP:ORGCRIT), but I'll gladly quote them here:

Individual sources must be evaluated separately and independently of each other and meet the four criteria below to determine if a source qualifies towards establishing notability.

  1. Contain significant coverage addressing the subject of the article directly and in depth.
  2. Be completely independent of the article subject.
  3. Meet the standard for being a reliable source.
  4. Be a secondary source, primary and tertiary sources do not count towards establishing notability.
AngryHarpy‍talk 17:28, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question Regarding Appalachian FC

[edit]

Hi, Simpsun728. I see you put in work on the Appalachian FC new page. I am trying to get one made for Georgia Storm FC, who is in the same conference, but keep getting denied. Were you the publisher of Appalachian's article? I was hoping you could give some advice as they say Georgia Storm doesn't meet notability standards even though they qualified for the US Open Cup. https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:Georgia_Storm

Hi, Kevinw33. That's strange that it keeps getting taken down. Seems to me that Georgia Storm FC is just as legitimate as AFC is. In your responses to the editors, have you let them know that the team has a website, social media, etc? This seems like a no-brainer to me, so I am just as confused as you are. Let me know how I can help. Simpsun728 (talk) 17:41, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Simpsun728, I heard back that Appalachian FC and North Alabama SC were created using WP:Article Wizard rather than from scratch like I did. They apparently go through a different approval process. I resubmitted using the wizard... we'll see. Kevinw33 (talk) 18:49, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Simpsun728, rejected again... 90% of the NPSL teams have pages but I think I keep getting non-sports fans reviewing my page! Kevinw33 (talk) 14:39, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mint Hill F.C. moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Mint Hill F.C., is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) (we don't consider Twitter a reliable source) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JW 1961 Talk 19:18, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this! I will keep the draft here until I can compile more sources. Simpsun728 (talk) 19:29, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thats great, welcome to Wikipedia and I hope you have a great time contributing here JW 1961 Talk 20:16, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mint Hill FC crest.jpeg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mint Hill FC crest.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mint Hill F.C.

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Simpsun728. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mint Hill F.C., a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:25, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mint Hill F.C.

[edit]

Hello, Simpsun728. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mint Hill F.C.".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:29, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mint Hill F.C. (April 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gpkp was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Gpkp [u • t • c] 06:39, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Simpsun728! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gpkp [u • t • c] 06:39, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mint Hill F.C. (April 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 17:32, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi KyleTastic. These are all the sources that exist on the club right now. It is still very young. What else would you like me to include? Thanks. Simpsun728 (talk) 17:36, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mint Hill F.C.

[edit]

Hello, Simpsun728. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mint Hill F.C.".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:06, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Dallas_Beer_Guardians
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Simpsun728&oldid=1118406027"