User talk:Simon5761

Hi, the copyright to that image of Jagjit Singh is owned by me and my company (Heritage Arts and Events Ltd./HAE Live UK). So, please don't remove it. Thanks!

It doesn't matter if you are the copyright holder, use of copyrighted images is against policy. If you wish to release the copyright, follow the intructions at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. 98.248.32.178 (talk) 17:33, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Do not use copyrighted images. 98.248.32.178 (talk) 16:37, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. 98.248.32.178 (talk) 16:45, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adding external links to an article or user page for the purpose of promoting a website or a product is not allowed, and is considered to be spam.

98.248.32.178 (talk) 19:21, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Family of Barack Obama, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diannaa ^(Talk) 22:26, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Bush family Jojhutton (talk) 22:37, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Bush family. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. George2001hi (Discussion) 22:54, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Jagjit Singh performing at Symphony Hall, Birmingham.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Jagjit Singh performing at Symphony Hall, Birmingham.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. MGA73 (talk) 21:35, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please Provide References before changing the "Years Active" part of the article Jagjit Singh

Please specify any work of him released in 1961 before making the changes in 'years active'. Otherwise DON'T change that part now. Wikiglobaleditor (talk) 08:49, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011 (again)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jagjit Singh by supporting advertisements posts. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 12:18, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits on Jagjit Singh

Provide notable references of PM being "avid admirer" of Jagjit Singh.
Provide notable references of he having performed "300 concerts at New Delhi's Siri Fort Auditorium".
His performaces on 150th anniversary of India's First War of Independence are mentioned below too. They are not needed in Intro.
Titles of the albums should be in italics; not the co-artists.
Advertisements are not allowed on wikipedia.

Make useful changes to Wikipedia. If new, use your sandbox or ask for help from other experienced editors. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 12:44, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You can reply here with your views. I am reading. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 13:55, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the Discography section, you can make the Album Titles italics, not an issue. BTW, Jagjit Singh is a prominent and highly acclaimed Ghazal singer of India - no doubt on that. - Wikiglobaleditor (talk) 20:02, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I heard it as well, that India's current PM Manmohan Singh and his wife Gursharan Kaur are his avid admirers, and they all are from the same Sikh community of India. - Wikiglobaleditor (talk) 20:20, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For all of the things you (or anyone for the fact) hear, can not be trusted. I heard that PM hates Jagjit Singh. But as i dont have a reliable source, i am not adding that in the article. And if the logic behind he being avid admirer is that they are from same community, is PM also avid admirer of Satwant Singh & Beant Singh? If so, you should also add that on their pages. And as to your point of Jagjit Singh being "a prominent and highly acclaimed singer", you should add a source for reference which states so. Till then this statement seems like a fan's view. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 11:08, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Animeshkulkarni I wonder that you are from India and still have a doubt that whether Jagjit Singh is a "a prominent and highly acclaimed singer" of India. All the Indian media and personalities from Indian Entertainment industry unanimously accepted him as the "King of Gazal" - every Indian has seen it - except you. Do you have any personal agenda on this article?? If so you can divulge that to my talk page frankly. -- Wikiglobaleditor (talk) 22:03, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BTW User:Animeshkulkarni... you heard that PM hates Jagjit Singh... ridiculous, tell me frankly why you are here - to contribute OR to create nuisances ??? -- Wikiglobaleditor (talk) 22:27, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

Please do not add unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. and edit warring to keep it in the article will get you blocked also. Elen of the Roads (talk) 15:50, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Apart from the issues mentioned above, there are other problems with your editing of Jagjit Singh. Some of your editing has added subjective opinion, rather than verifiable fact. For example, describing something as "a milestone joint session" is making a judgement as to its significance. It is at best questionable whether the links to www.eventspakistan.com are compliant with the guidelines on external links. Despite attempts by other editors to communicate with you, you seem to have made no attempt to discuss your edits, to explain why they are justified, or to work towards consensus. Your editing of the article constitutes an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, under Wikipedia's policy on edit warring you should not edit war even if you believe you are right. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:04, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Jagjit Singh. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Elen of the Roads (talk) 17:53, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your last edits as it was edit warring to add the same unsourced personal opinion as you have been warned about previously Elen of the Roads (talk) 17:56, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

... and Elen of the Roads - lack of citation doesn't mean that that references doesn't exist. Try to improve the articles by adding the missing references. Wikimedia Foundation requires more contributors than police persons! - Wikiglobaleditor (talk) 22:10, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend that you ignore the above comment, and instead read WP:BURDEN. The onus to provide citations rests with the editor who wants to add the information. If you fail to provide a citation to a reliable source, other editors may legitimately remove your edits. If you edit war to keep the material in the article, you will end up blocked from editing as you are now. If the Indian equivalent of Rolling Stone magazine has described this person as the best vocalist ever, then you may legitimately add this sourced fact to the article. What you may not do is add your own opinion as to how good a singer he is. Elen of the Roads (talk) 22:58, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges, as you did at Jagjit Singh. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elen of the Roads (talk) 16:11, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Straight back to it, re-adding unsourced information and advertising puff - and in one case adding information into a sourced sentence that is not supported by the source. This time you have been blocked for a week. I suggest you try learning from this experience, because the next block will be for a month, should you repeat the offence. Elen of the Roads (talk) 16:13, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jagjit Singh's image....

Hello, Simon5761. You have new messages at Talk:Jagjit_Singh#Image.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-Animeshkulkarni (talk) 18:25, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Hello! If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.

This includes the article about Jagjit Singh as you are representing his "Promotion Team".
-Animeshkulkarni (talk) 08:24, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I get that you dont want information to be misrepresented. But can you talk? Here, Jagjit Singh's talk page or my talk page? You dont have to revert all edits. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 10:25, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

Your recent editing history at Jagjit Singh shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Sitush (talk) 12:13, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image

Please don't re-add that copyrighted photograph to the infobox until we can verify that you hold the copyright; to do that, you need to contact WP:OTRS. Even after you do that, though, the image currently in the lead is a better one. The lead image should be a clear shot of the person, ideally at a normal angle, and ideally showing the person's face clearly. The image currently in the infobox does that far better than the one you're trying to add. Please note that if you continue to try to "force" your picture into the infobox, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia temporarily for edit warring. Qwyrxian (talk) 12:16, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent edit warring and attempting to exert control over Jagjit Singh, as though you own the article, together with other disruptive editing. Considering the length of time over which your problematic editing has taken place, and the number of warnings you have received, it is surprising that you have not already received a long term block. You need to understand that you have no proprietorial rights over any Wikipedia article, and other editors have as much right to contribute as you have. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:51, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]