User talk:Simin

Brsjak Revolt

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Brsjak Revolt. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.--Zoupan 22:05, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Use the talk page. State your edits.--Zoupan 22:33, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Of course I will. However I wonder why you reverted my message in your talk page?--Simin (talk) 22:35, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

As a further note, don't template the regulars as you did on Zoupan's talk page. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 05:32, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for the note, Iryna Harpy. Did you put same note to Zoupan who started with this kind of templates and have been deleted all my contributions? Best regards, --Simin (talk) 18:23, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

No, Simin. While I can appreciate that you are an experienced Wikipedian on Bulgarian Wikipedia, each Wikipedia works independently of each other. I'm sure you'd be aware, for example, that being blocked on one Wikipedia has no bearing on whether an editor is blocked on any other Wikipedias. In that sense, with under 300 edits on English Wikipedia, you are not a regular but a newbie, therefore while I understand that you may have taken offence at being templated, it is not unwarranted for Zoupan to have templated you. Hopefully, you can both discuss issues on the talk page of the article in question in a collegial and collaborative manner. Cheers! --Iryna Harpy (talk) 21:04, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you, Iryna, for this clarification. I think I understood the procedure in this case. Best regards,--Simin (talk) 21:12, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

You're welcome... and thank you for joining the English Wikipedia team! --Iryna Harpy (talk) 21:28, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Golloborda

Hey Simin! I saw that you've been editing a lot of hte pages about Golloborda recently. I've been trying to expand the page from it's current status of being a stub with only (boring to most readers) info about historical demographics and Bulgarian/Macedonian squabbling (which is also boring to most readers). I was wondering if perhaps you know something or have sources for the Medieval history of the region, given your apparent interest in it? I couldn't find sources in English about this. Cheers, --Calthinus (talk) 17:15, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi, Calthinus! Thank you for expanding this article. I'll check if I can find something for the Medieval period. Best regards,--Simin (talk) 19:06, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Simin. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)