User talk:Simbhu-936

welcome

Varalaxmi Sarathkumar

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Varalaxmi Sarathkumar. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Actor-simbu-photo-shoot-stills-images-photos-gallery-1.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Actor-simbu-photo-shoot-stills-images-photos-gallery-1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 18:05, 3 November 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:05, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Vaanam.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Vaanam.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 18:21, 3 November 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 18:21, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Dhanush uthama puthiran wallpapers posters.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Dhanush uthama puthiran wallpapers posters.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 18:21, 3 November 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 18:21, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 18:09, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to upload media files lacking copyright information, you may be blocked from editing. If you are unsure of the correct copyright template, please refer to the list of image copyright tags or ask at the copyright question page. DMacks (talk) 18:31, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vadjihoudine for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:20, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your block evasion has been confirmed. Every image you've uploaded under this account has been deleted; the article you wrote under this account has been deleted. You are not welcome to edit while you are blocked. This will happen with any new accounts you create upon their discovery. The block length for your primary account has been reset. The 30 days will now expire in December. If you want to continue contributing, you must follow policies related to image use, and you must do so under your primary account when the block has expired or been lifted. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 15:18, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Simbhu-936 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

78.227.117.212 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Simbhu-936". The reason given for Simbhu-936's block is: "Block evasion: Sock puppet of User:Vadjihoudine, checkuser c

Blocking administrator: Moonriddengirl (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 17:00, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Simbhu-936 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

78.227.117.212 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Block evasion: Sock puppet of User:Vadjihoudine, checkuser confirmed

Blocking administrator: Moonriddengirl (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Syrthiss (talk) 18:00, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have reset your block to disable your editing of this talk page given your continued misuse of the unblock request. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 21:39, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]