User talk:Simba22

Simba22 (talk) 06:21, 26 September 2013 (UTC)Karbeas was a ruler of the sovereign Paulician state. He was not prince,nor the Paulician state was a principality. Simba22 (talk) 20:50, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding a blog as a source in the Karbeas article. Blogs are not WP:RS, and much of the info contained there is inaccurate. BTW, principality means any state or statelet led by a monarchical figure, not necessarily one holding the title of "prince". --Constantine ✍ 06:01, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OKay, but I'm not sure that Karbeas was a monarchical figure.

Simba22 (talk) 06:21, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

He was the secular leader of an independent state, which he apparently led without being constrained by any other person or council. That makes him a monarch ("single-ruler"). If he were a Muslim, he'd be an emir. Constantine ✍ 06:27, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nane (goddess) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Paulician]] Armenians who were mostly Islamicised and later known as [[Pomaks]] in [[Europe]].<ref>[http://archive.is/F26y Edouard Selian (2010). The Immortal Spirit of the Goddess Nané</ref><ref>[http://archive.is/E98K Edouard Selian (2009). The Pomaks: an Islamized People of Eurоpe</ref> Her

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:24, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

You have been systematically inserting multiple references to some self-published papers by some author of dubious reliability, such as here [1]. Please stop doing this. These references do not count as reliable sources according to our rules and cannot be used in Wikipedia. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:48, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]