Jump to content

User talk:Silverleaf

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thank you for the warm welcome to Wikipedia. --Silverleaf . talk 04:39, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warm Welcome to Wikipedia

[edit]

Congrats. You're welcome. I kno u. -- Jïörüjï Ðērākō.>.cнаt^ 13:45, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lol & hi :). --Silverleaf 19:20, 21 September 2008 (UTC) *ps* Hope thats a good thing :). --Silverleaf 20:28, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Willem Oltmans.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 08:07, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

He's my Grandmothers Brother...wich makes me a great niece of him. I can use my family pictures any wich way I want can I not? --Silverleaf 14:54, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I am not allowed to upload an image of a deceased family member? --Silverleaf 11:32, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

re: Wot tags

[edit]

Every article needs to be referenced, it's how Wikipedia works, otherwise someone passing through can't verify the information. That's the primary issue, there also needs to be sources to establish notability with significant third party coverage, which I haven't tagged for (yet). Rehevkor 23:42, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The books are the reference in every single case of your tagging.--Silverleaf 19:39, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes but they still need to be cited to the books so someone reading the article can look up and verify the information if they so wish. Rehevkor 20:02, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


re This

[edit]

Every article needs to be referenced. But I think I already mentioned that. What is common knowledge to one person may not be to another, and articles needs to be written so a layman can understand, how do they know what they're reading is true without sources to back it up? Apologies on the wrong template, now fixed. I didn't tag it but the image in the article also needs a fair use rational. Rehevkor 19:57, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Willem Oltmans.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Willem Oltmans.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:40, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

w/e...use all your bureaucratic dictatorship to erase an image from my relative. --Silverleaf 17:42, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

[edit]

Hi Silverleaf!

I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!

It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!

Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!

Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 18:28, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done! --Silverleaf 20:39, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiWomen's Collaborative

[edit]
WikiWomen Unite!
Hi Silverleaf! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative.

As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:

We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can get involved!

Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 04:58, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiWomen's Collaborative: Come join us (and check out our new website)!

[edit]
WikiWomen - We need you!
Hi Silverleaf! The WikiWomen's Collaborative is a group of women from around the world who edit Wikipedia, contribute to its sister projects, and support the mission of free knowledge. We recently updated our website, created new volunteer positions, and more!

Get involved by:

  • Visiting our website for resources, events, and more
  • Meet other women and share your story in our profile space
  • Participate at and "like" our Facebook group
  • Join the conversation on our Twitter feed
  • Reading and writing for our blog channel
  • Volunteer to write for our blog, recruit blog writers, translate content, and co-run our Facebook and receive perks for volunteering
  • Already participating? Take our survey and share your experience!

Thanks for editing Wikipedia, and we look forward to you being a part of the Collaborative! -- EdwardsBot (talk) 01:37, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]