User talk:Silveresc

July 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Mikheil Saakashvili, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 23:03, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Your edit to Georgian Dream has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 21:43, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Strategy Aghmashenebeli, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Davit Aghmashenebeli. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 7, 2023

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Irakli Kobakhidze. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. DerFuchs (talk) 17:40, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Mikheil Saakashvili. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. — Archer1234 (t·c) 00:32, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited LGBT rights in Georgia (country), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Limited liability, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Poole.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Your edit to Censorship of LGBT issues has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your third warning. — Diannaa (talk) 20:56, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warning about edit warring on War in Abkhazia (1992–1993) page

Hello, it seems like you might be engaged in edit war on War in Abkhazia (1992–1993) page, since edit warring is prohibited on Wikipedia, please refrain from reverting edits for more than 3 times ove 24 hours and discuss issues on Talk page.

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Cutoc (talk) 14:46, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not engaged in "edit war", I try to discuss the topic on Talk page, you can see my comment here. --Silveresc (talk) 14:55, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but frequent reverting constitutes an edit warring which might result in ban for 24 hours or more. Please take notice of this. Cutoc (talk) 20:59, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Silveresc: You have reverted an edit on on War in Abkhazia (1992–1993) page again. Please note that controversial topics need to be settled only through discussion, not edit war. If you violate three-revert rule of Wikipedia, you might get reported and banned from Wikipedia for edit war. Cutoc (talk) 23:33, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from History of Abkhazia into Sochi conflict. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:37, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abkhaz–Georgian conflict, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antiquity.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warning about personal attacks

Please stop your disruptive editing. Cutoc (talk) 13:59, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Could you at least elaborate what you are referring to this time?Silveresc (talk) 14:11, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent activity might be in violation of WP:NOPA. There was another message left for you which explained situation in more depth. This was just a reminder. Cutoc (talk) 14:17, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. If you have questions, please request help at the Teahouse. // Timothy :: talk 02:51, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Zviad Gamsakhurdia

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Zviad Gamsakhurdia. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. // Timothy :: talk 02:57, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. // Timothy :: talk 03:39, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Zviad Gamsakhurdia) for a period of 2 weeks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Lourdes 05:13, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Abkhazia

Your edits were reverted with the editor's edit summary stating that your changes did not reflect the body, yet you are still making changes to the lead that do not reflect what is written in the body. Mellk (talk) 12:47, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, which edits are you referring to? Silveresc (talk) 12:48, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For example here, but from what I can see, the body only mentions the Georgian parliament passing the resolution and OSCE (also Wikipedia is not a reliable source). In this edit (granted, which you deleted afterwards), I do not see a mention of military bases being the cause for the resolution declaring the territory as occupied. Mellk (talk) 12:56, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here you include statements from 15 countries and declare this as most countries. Are you also familiar with the policy on WP:SYNTH? I would suggest to discuss this on the talk page instead, there is already a related discussion. Mellk (talk) 13:24, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I will edit it. But I will find other sources that majority of countries recognizes it occupied. Silveresc (talk) 13:26, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

English please

I noticed that you have posted comments to the page Talk:Zviad Gamsakhurdia in a language other than English. At the English-language Wikipedia, we try to use English for all comments. Posting all comments in English makes it easier for other editors to join the conversation and help you. If you cannot avoid using another language, then please provide a translation into English, if you can. If you cannot provide a translation, please go to the list of Wikipedias, look in the list for a Wikipedia that is in your language, and edit there instead of here. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. — kashmīrī ^TALK 00:51, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely

I have Confirmed this account to Rsazr and so have blocked you indefinitely. --Yamla (talk) 01:54, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public. You may instead email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-enwikimedia.org with your username and appeal.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Yamla (talk) 01:54, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tergdaleulebi moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Tergdaleulebi. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and POV sock article. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. // Timothy :: talk 03:56, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Tergdaleulebi

Hello, Silveresc. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tergdaleulebi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:06, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tergdaleulebi

Hello, Silveresc. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Tergdaleulebi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:09, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]