User talk:Silksyummy

Welcome!

Hi Silksyummy! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 19:22, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mohammed Arkoun, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 22:55, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this information has been removed without reason. Silksyummy (talk) 12:07, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Lounès Matoub, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 00:08, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, according to sources his native language was kabyle Silksyummy (talk) 00:09, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Lounès Matoub. M.Bitton (talk) 00:12, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Like any other Algerian, his name is written in Arabic. M.Bitton (talk) 00:13, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

3rd source talks about trial of his assassination, check this and others sources. Silksyummy (talk) 00:14, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Matoub Lounès hadn't spoken Arab in his entire life, take a look about sources and his native language is kabyle. Did you read his biography and sources ??? Silksyummy (talk) 00:16, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

His official birth name is in Arabic. That's a fact. M.Bitton (talk) 00:19, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm M.Bitton. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Lounès Matoub, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 00:21, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Arabic isn't his native language Silksyummy (talk) 00:23, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bring a source that prove his native language was Arabic. All sources show out his "berberism" so please bring a source.

Silksyummy (talk) 00:26, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Noname JR. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 00:29, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, have you checked sources about Matoub Lounès' native language ? Silksyummy (talk) 09:58, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Noname JR per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Noname JR. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:10, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Silksyummy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, i'm blocked for no reason, you can check my historic, I have always added sources or bring arguments for any contributions, there is a mistake.

Decline reason:

You were not blocked for "no reason". You were blocked for abusing multiple accounts. Please ensure that you address this in any future appeals. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:19, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Silksyummy (talk) 22:06, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For example, all sources have pointed out about Matoub Lounès's fighting for kabyle language which is native language also in these songs or in interview. It's irrelevant to replace it by another language. There is a mistake or a lack of knowledge even with sources...

Silksyummy (talk) 22:14, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Silksyummy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I haven't done multiple accounts (that's authorized), then I have not disrupted, I have always brought sources or arguments, you can check my history and I have brought an example, Matoub Lounès. There is a lack of knowledge but why has someone blocked me if sources (sometimes already in article) approve some facts that I try to correct. You can check my history. I have never do any vandalism.

Decline reason:

After reviewing the SPI I have the greatest confidence that it came to the correct conclusion. Simply saying you're not a sock won't get you unblocked—if we unblocked everyone who said that, we might as well not have a sockpuppetry policy. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:10, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Silksyummy (talk) 22:32, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

real vandalism, removing sources without adding any this article is disrupted now, it history begins only at Fatimid caliphate whereas a lot of sources talks about Antiquity era in Africa. That's irrelevant. Silksyummy (talk) 23:18, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Silksyummy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I don't understand where is sockppupetry, for what or when ???? I have explained that I have never done a vandalism and now I'm blocked because someone doesn't know who is Matoub Lounès and there are sources to prove this. Just please look at sources and my history, it takes about 10 minutes. real vandalism, removing sources without adding any. To my mind, this is not an "Administrator" (used to treat unblocked appeals via informatic tools (not always useful)) to do this one but someone who knows reading because that's 3rd appeal and no one talks about facts, it's unfair and irrelevant. Matoub Lounès have never spoken arabic neither as native language (or bring sources), Kabyles' history have never began at Fatimid caliphate and everyone who will try to correct its, will be blocked too so ?

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:20, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Silksyummy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I have understood reason for why I'm blocked. I will not disrupt an article, I'll create a subject in article's talk page or explain through sources (or bringing ones) for minor edits.

Decline reason:

Declining this one on the merits (or lack thereof) of the unblock request. You don't address your abuse of multiple accounts at all. Yamla (talk) 10:36, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Silksyummy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I have understood reason for why I'm blocked. I will not disrupt an article, I'll create a subject in article's talk page or explain through sources (or bringing ones) for minor edits. I didn't use multiple accounts (that's authorized)

Decline reason:

You still aren't addressing the reason for the block, the sockpuppetry as you did indeed use multiple accounts. At this point, we are wasting time with the repeated unblock requests, and I am removing talk page access at this time. You can file an unblock request at WP:UTRS if you wish to be unblocked, but you need to address the reason for your blocking. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:34, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.