Jump to content

User talk:SilentMonolith

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

SilentMonolith, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi SilentMonolith! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

October 2021

[edit]
Information icon

Hello SilentMonolith. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:SilentMonolith. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=SilentMonolith|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Kuru (talk) 00:12, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User:Kuru

Thank you for highlighting the issues in my editing. I will make sure to correct my mistakes. But I do not understand, because I am not being paid for this? I do this to become an editor not to run my house, lol. I am just joking. I will take care of what and how i edit. :) --SilentMonolith (talk) 07:59, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abdalla Dahir Abdullahi (October 12)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 10:38, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:CharmenderDeol per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CharmenderDeol. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  GeneralNotability (talk) 01:52, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]