User talk:Sijadthelastpoet

Welcome!

Hello, Sijadthelastpoet, and welcome to Wikipedia ! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:21, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of content

WP:SOURCE When you removed this sourced information, someone reverted you. Why would you remove information that has a source to it? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:56, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Cave, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Quasar G ^{t - c} 14:47, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ancient Arabic

Hi Sijadthelastpoet, we are not doubting that the Old Arabic and Old English words for Earth are similar, but that doesn't imply that one came from the other. It is much more likely that both derive from PIE. Can you trace the Arabic word back to Old Persian and Iranian? Dbfirs 14:58, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In this case Shall I ask you, the Word Ard" existed in Old Persian or ont? If Not that proves that Arabic ARd is the root of its English daugther becausE Old Arabic was before Old English. Isn'T?

Sijadthelastpoet (talk) 15:31, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Experts have spent long hours researching etymology. Similarities sometimes indicate that a word transferred from Arabic. We have a long list at List of English words of Arabic origin. In other cases, the similarities indicate a common root. There may be other cases where the similarity is just a coincidence. Please do the research, and don't make assumptions. If you don't have easy access to major dictionaries, then the Onlime Etymology Dictionary summarises what the big Oxford English Dictionary says. Dbfirs 15:59, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, but we must mention it .Cave, Earth and Wine for example. In the future we don't know witch one will be surprised? Other example the French Word "malade" that mean sick, perhaps is from Other Anciant Arabic word ( maradh = illness)

Sijadthelastpoet (talk) 16:21, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, Wikipedia should not contain WP:Original research or your personal opinion. Any suggestions that you add about new etymologies should be referenced to WP:Reliable sources. French Wiktionary says that malade is from Old French malabde which came from Vulgar Latin male habitus. It would be interesting to know the etymology of the Arabic word. Maltese does have a word marad that came from Arabic. Dbfirs 16:37, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sciences beginns with doubts and assumptions.

The malteese is a variant of Arabic dialects. Sijadthelastpoet (talk) 18:49, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, it is only right to investigate links between words. If you can find WP:Reliable sources that support your guesses, then by all means put the claims back in Wikipedia, but it would be wrong to replace hundreds of years of linguistic research with a guess based on similarity. That's not how science works. Dbfirs 19:17, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Easily.we.can.prove that.the Arabic words "ARd" and.Kaf are both Old more than 15 centuries. Because these Words are mentionned in the Holy Coran. Can you prove that the similars English words are more than 15 centuries? You cant because. Anciant Arabic is more old than your Anciant English. You understand Why I said strong probably.

What say English dictinnary about the root of the word "Cave" I m sure that he can say nothing ! Sijadthelastpoet (talk) 20:04, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is another proof. In French we Also say "alcove" and we can see Easily the arabic root! You see! Sijadthelastpoet (talk) 20:25, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sijadthelastpoet (talk) 20:25, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Some.scientists.can.Easily.falsify.The .truth. they prefer.ly.To. say.The.truth.The.great.exemple.is. the french word malade. You say that the french wikitionary say that is from latin. It is impropable. We can say that the word passed from Arabi via Spain or Sicilia. Sijadthelastpoet (talk) 20:46, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sijad – I noticed you made another unsourced change at cave. From my perspective, as a layman, you seem to know quite a lot about etymology and linguistics. However, Wikipedia does not publish original research, and whether you think "scientists can easily falsify the truth" or not, doesn't matter. If someone comes up with a theory (about the origin of a word, for example) and it is published in a reliable, unbiased source, then it is probably OK to include it in Wikipedia. Unfortunately, your additions to articles will not be accepted until you back them up with a such a source. Thanks — Quasar G ^{t - c} 21:13, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct about alcove but not about cave which comes from Latin cavus (hollow). As I wrote earlier, some similarities occur because there is a common root in Proto-Indo-European language. In Wikipedia, we can only report what scholars have theorised. Your opinion of probability, and mine don't really count for anything here. Dbfirs 21:46, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sijadthelastpoet, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.