User talk:Siffat05
| This user is a student editor in University_of_Massachusetts_Lowell/Qualitative_Research_Advanced_Topics_(Spring_2020) . |
Hello
Siffat, thank you so much for your comments and suggestions to my piece. I really appreciate it.
TeresaTeresa Varriale Gonzalez 04:27, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Siffat05, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Elysia and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Elysia (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:19, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi Siffat, it's Andrea from class
[edit]I reviewed your page last week and provide the following comments: Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? Siffat captured multiple components of visual ethnography. There was nothing distracting.
Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
It seems that Siffat kept the information neutral and not biased.
Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
I think that Siffat presented multiple facets of this topic and did not overrepresent or underrepresent.
Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
Citations are included but not linked in.
Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
Sources include texts, and articles which all are current from 2013-2019.
Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?
Not that I can see at this time. I believe that Siffat did (or is planning to) link some of this article to other articles, which would be a good approach. I would suggest maybe changing the order of topics with “historical significance” topics first, then methodology, then current state of visual ethnography. ACMwiki2020ACMwiki2020 (talk) 18:31, 8 April 2020 (UTC)