User talk:Siepmann

Siepmann, I'm concerned about all these new pages you are creating. Where are you getting the material for the pages from?--Kchase T 09:38, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All the material is just stuff that I learnt when I was a member of the CCF. The speed at which I'm creating them is due to the fact that I'm lifting it from my own website onto Wiki!— Preceding unsigned comment added by Siepmann (talk • contribs)

OK, cool. As you surmised, I was concerned about copyright. Thanks for answering my query. btw, you can sign your posts by putting four tildes, like so: ~~~~. Cheers!--Kchase T 09:46, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for looking out. Actually, I am going to remove the images because I can't remember where I got them from (it was years ago I did this stuff) and they may have been out of a book - better not risk it! Thanks Siepmann 09:50, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Knots1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Knots1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:04, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Handle_this_situation_-_going_to_bed nothing personal --mboverload @ 10:09, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - yes - I've explained this to Kchase - I'm just transferring a bunch of articles from my own website onto Wiki. Siepmann 10:11, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid that sums up the problem. The articles you have added appear to have been just transferred from another site. Whether or not there is any IP owned by the Royal Navy in them is just one issue; these articles appear to be largely unencyclopedic, containing a mix of instruction manuals, lists of rules and descriptions of sailing practices. Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, and be sure that the articles you create will be appropriate for inclusion in Wikipedia. Another issue is that they appear to be composed mostly of raw HTML — this makes things difficult for future editors and creates a whole host of problems. You might take a look at Wikipedia:Manual of Style to read about recommended formatting and writing practices.

Your efforts are appreciated, but I am concerned that the articles you've added will just end up creating a lot of work for other editors and for admins trying to clean things up. --Ptkfgs 10:19, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your website

It's a good idea, if you're transferring information from your own website here, to just put a quick note on the talk page of the article saying where the original website is/was, and that you are the author and you're now releasing the text under Wikipedia's terms (i.e. you're renouncing the copyright yourself). Otherwise it may be marked as a copyright violation if someone finds your website and notices the text is the same, and people's time will be wasted lookint into it. I think there are also concerns about how suitable some of this is for an encyclopaedia. --ajn (talk) 10:22, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Siepmann, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

I hope you take a look at the links above to help you understand how to improve your articles so they become excellent articles. Some basic suggestions:

The articles need introductions. For example, I don't know what rules of the road you are talking about. (They don't sound like the rules of driving around California where I live!) Assume an international readership of all ages.
Add links to other articles, and when you are done, add links to your articles.
Find out what articles already exist on the topic. Perhaps there is already an article that has some or all of the information you are adding. One way to find articles is to look in the category where you would expect the article to be.
Ask for help if you need it.
Don't be scared off by easily. It takes a while to get used to how things work. Comments might seem harsh so try not to take it personally. Some "mistakes" can look just like vandalism.

--Samuel Wantman 06:49, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Knots10.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Knots10.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:46, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Knots4.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Knots4.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:11, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Knots5.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Knots5.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:18, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Peter Siepmann

The article Peter Siepmann has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. WWGB (talk) 13:00, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Peter Siepmann

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Peter Siepmann requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 13:00, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Siepmann

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Peter Siepmann, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 13:14, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremy Siepmann

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Jeremy Siepmann, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.jeremysiepmann.com/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:35, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jeremy Siepmann

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jeremy Siepmann requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.jeremysiepmann.com/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Finngall ^talk 18:19, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]