User talk:Siensuw
January 2025
[edit]Hello, I'm Marincyclist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Artsakh (historical province) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Marincyclist (talk) 21:57, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- It is not unconstructive, the name Artsakh did not come from Orchistene or Ardakh/Urtekhini/Atakhuni Siensuw (talk) 22:01, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- I suggest discussing the name change on the article talk page. Marincyclist (talk) 22:02, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to List of sovereign states by date of formation. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Catalyzzt (talk) 22:13, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. 331dot (talk) 22:14, 10 January 2025 (UTC) |
I believe that you created this account to evade your topic ban. 331dot (talk) 22:14, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- I have not been violating any kind of policies, the sites and evidence are in other articles. Look for yourself Siensuw (talk) 22:16, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Siensuw (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Your reason here This is just unfair, I am not trying to be a sockpuppet
Decline reason:
Procedural decline - no answer to Ponyo's question. PhilKnight (talk) 04:17, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.